-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/50154/#review143826
-----------------------------------------------------------




docs/learn/documentation/versioned/rest/overview.md (line 104)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/50154/#comment209758>

    Is there is no default log4j in the generate tar ball, it will good to move 
this "fyi" info above near the deployment steps.


- Navina Ramesh


On July 27, 2016, 8:47 p.m., Jake Maes wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/50154/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 27, 2016, 8:47 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for samza, Boris Shkolnik, Chris Pettitt, Jake Maes, Navina 
> Ramesh, Jagadish Venkatraman, Xinyu Liu, and Yi Pan (Data Infrastructure).
> 
> 
> Bugs: SAMZA-976
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-976
> 
> 
> Repository: samza
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> SAMZA-976 Samza REST Documentation
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   bin/generate-javadocs.sh da9f32da8f2a1f89ff28178ee703c4a065189da8 
>   docs/img/versioned/learn/documentation/rest/JobsResource.png PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/learn/documentation/versioned/index.html 
> 1e79bd6f39ee67b5a2b74222d647342990bbbe23 
>   docs/learn/documentation/versioned/rest/monitors.md PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/learn/documentation/versioned/rest/overview.md PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/learn/documentation/versioned/rest/resource-directory.md PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/learn/documentation/versioned/rest/resources.md PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/learn/documentation/versioned/rest/resources/jobs.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50154/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Verified by building the local site documentation and browsing. I wasn't able 
> to verify the javadoc. If anyone knows why java doc would not be generated 
> for new classes, I'd be interested to know.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jake Maes
> 
>

Reply via email to