Hey Julian, It looks like Calcite is at least setup to publish to Maven:
https://repository.apache.org/#nexus-search;quick~calcite Julian, can you publish SNAPSHOT releases with your streaming changes to it? Thanks! Chris On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org> wrote: > Hey Milinda, > > I've just committed SAMZA-484, so you should be able to re-base and get > all the latest code. > > > But we need to add Calcite as a dependency and Calcite streaming > support is only in Julian's branch > > We'll have to have Julian publish a release to Apache. This can be a > SNAPSHOT to Apache's SNAPSHOT repo, or a real Calcite release. We can't > check in binaries to the repo (licensing, release complexity, and just > generally a bad idea). We'll have to coordinate with him. > > Cheers, > Chris > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Milinda Pathirage <mpath...@umail.iu.edu> > wrote: > >> No, SAMZA-483 doesn't depend on SAMZA-484. But we need to add Calcite as a >> dependency and Calcite streaming support is only in Julian's branch ( >> https://github.com/julianhyde/incubator-calcite/tree/chi). What can we do >> about that? >> >> Milinda >> >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > Hey Milinda, >> > >> > That'd be great. Do you have any dependency on SAMZA-484? I haven't had >> a >> > chance to commit that one yet. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Chris >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Milinda Pathirage < >> mpath...@umail.iu.edu> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > /need/want >> > > >> > > Milinda >> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Milinda Pathirage < >> > mpath...@umail.iu.edu >> > > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Chris, >> > > > >> > > > Do you need me to create the SAMZA-483 patch against latest master >> with >> > > > SAMZA-482 patch? I think that will make it easier to review the >> patch? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks >> > > > Milinda >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Chris Riccomini < >> > criccom...@apache.org> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> Cool. Looks like we've got consensus. I'll move forward with RTC on >> > some >> > > >> of >> > > >> the early SAMZA-390 tickets. (SAMZA-482, SAMZA-483, SAMZA-484) >> > > >> >> > > >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Yan Fang <yanfang...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> > +1 on this. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Fang, Yan >> > > >> > yanfang...@gmail.com >> > > >> > +1 (206) 849-4108 >> > > >> > >> > > >> > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Chris Riccomini < >> > > criccom...@apache.org> >> > > >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Hey all, >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Are we +1 on this? I think Jakob was the only one who was >> curious >> > > >> about >> > > >> > it. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > >> > > Chris >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Hi, Jakob, >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > Eh? Not sure what this means... >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > I mean SAMZA-484 depends on SAMZA-482, and neither are >> > > committed. >> > > >> So >> > > >> > > > Navina >> > > >> > > > > is having to post Yi's patch, as well as her own, on the >> JIRA. >> > > It >> > > >> > makes >> > > >> > > > it >> > > >> > > > > really hard to do code reviews because you can't tell >> whether >> > Yi >> > > >> made >> > > >> > > the >> > > >> > > > > changes or Navina did. >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > Just to add to the point. It is also difficult to always see >> a >> > > long >> > > >> > list >> > > >> > > of >> > > >> > > > changed files if the RB request is always based on the >> master. >> > It >> > > is >> > > >> > > > possible to have RB request based on another RB request (I >> have >> > > >> tried >> > > >> > it >> > > >> > > > before). But what happens if the base RB request is >> > > >> > cancelled/discarded? >> > > >> > > RB >> > > >> > > > is not designed to track the revision changes in a dependency >> > > chain. >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > Cheers, >> > > >> > > > > Chris >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Jakob Homan < >> > jgho...@gmail.com >> > > > >> > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > I want to avoid branches, >> > > >> > > > > > Just curious, any reason for this? >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > and I also want to avoid revision control over JIRA >> > > >> > > > > > Eh? Not sure what this means... >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > Thanks, >> > > >> > > > > > jg >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > On 4 February 2015 at 17:11, Chris Riccomini < >> > > >> > criccom...@apache.org> >> > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > > > > Hey all, >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > @Jakob, yeah I was thinking we'll follow our normal >> flow. >> > > >> RTC. I >> > > >> > > just >> > > >> > > > > > > wanted to set expectation that the code committed >> might be >> > > >> not up >> > > >> > > to >> > > >> > > > > our >> > > >> > > > > > > normal quality initially (missing docs, no tests, etc). >> > > Until >> > > >> the >> > > >> > > > > quality >> > > >> > > > > > > is raised, we should think of this module as >> experimental. >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > @Milinda, awesome! Thanks. :) >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > Cheers, >> > > >> > > > > > > Chris >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Milinda Pathirage < >> > > >> > > > > > mpath...@umail.iu.edu> >> > > >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> Hi Chris, >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> Hope we no longer need the SQL API. I'll create a RB >> for >> > > >> Calcite >> > > >> > > > > > >> integration. >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> Thanks >> > > >> > > > > > >> Milinda >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Chris Riccomini < >> > > >> > > > > criccom...@apache.org> >> > > >> > > > > > >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> > I think so. There was some RB downtime, but it just >> got >> > > >> fixed. >> > > >> > > Yi, >> > > >> > > > > > >> Navina, >> > > >> > > > > > >> > Milinda, can you make sure your JIRAs have up to >> date >> > > RBs? >> > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:24 AM, sriram < >> > > >> sriram....@gmail.com >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > Can we have updated RBs for all the three sub >> tasks >> > > >> before >> > > >> > we >> > > >> > > > > > commit? >> > > >> > > > > > >> > This >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > would help us to review even after we commit. >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Chris Riccomini < >> > > >> > > > > > >> criccom...@apache.org> >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Hey all, >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Yi, Navina, and Milinda have been working on >> > > SAMZA-390 >> > > >> > > > > sub-tickets >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > related >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > to SQL operators. We're getting to the point >> where >> > > the >> > > >> > > amount >> > > >> > > > of >> > > >> > > > > > work >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > floating around is quite large, and some tickets >> > > build >> > > >> off >> > > >> > > of >> > > >> > > > > > others. >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I'm proposing that we commit this work into a >> > > samza-sql >> > > >> > > > > submodule >> > > >> > > > > > on >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > master, and treat this module as experimental. I >> > want >> > > >> to >> > > >> > > avoid >> > > >> > > > > > >> > branches, >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > and I also want to avoid revision control over >> > JIRA. >> > > >> This >> > > >> > > > means >> > > >> > > > > > that >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > there >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > will probably be a fair amount of commits/JIRAs >> on >> > > this >> > > >> > > module >> > > >> > > > > as >> > > >> > > > > > we >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > iterate, but I think that's OK. >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Does this sound good to everyone? >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Cheers, >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Chris >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> -- >> > > >> > > > > > >> Milinda Pathirage >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> PhD Student | Research Assistant >> > > >> > > > > > >> School of Informatics and Computing | Data to Insight >> > > Center >> > > >> > > > > > >> Indiana University >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> twitter: milindalakmal >> > > >> > > > > > >> skype: milinda.pathirage >> > > >> > > > > > >> blog: http://milinda.pathirage.org >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Milinda Pathirage >> > > > >> > > > PhD Student | Research Assistant >> > > > School of Informatics and Computing | Data to Insight Center >> > > > Indiana University >> > > > >> > > > twitter: milindalakmal >> > > > skype: milinda.pathirage >> > > > blog: http://milinda.pathirage.org >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Milinda Pathirage >> > > >> > > PhD Student | Research Assistant >> > > School of Informatics and Computing | Data to Insight Center >> > > Indiana University >> > > >> > > twitter: milindalakmal >> > > skype: milinda.pathirage >> > > blog: http://milinda.pathirage.org >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Milinda Pathirage >> >> PhD Student | Research Assistant >> School of Informatics and Computing | Data to Insight Center >> Indiana University >> >> twitter: milindalakmal >> skype: milinda.pathirage >> blog: http://milinda.pathirage.org >> > >
