That's make sense, because the IDE know where to grab the original source
code.
I'm splitting now a project and I will test but for your example I'm
confident that will work :)
Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com> escreveu no dia sexta, 20/05/2022
à(s) 23:50:
> We are missing something because I can...
> Do you have a main project with one asconfig and the library with another
> asconfig?
> In the asconfig of the main project you have to put all the paths where
> the code can be found in the conditional compile option "source-path".
>
> Ex:
>
> {
> "config": "royale",
> "compilerOptions": {
> "debug": true,
> "targets": ["JSRoyale"],
> "html-template":
> "src/main/resources/royale-echarts-examples-template.html",
> "source-path": [
> "src/main/royale",
> "../royale-echarts/src/main/royale/" <--- *********** physical
> route to the library ****************
> ],
> "namespace": [
> {
> "uri": "library://ns.apache.org/royale/community/echarts",
> "manifest":
> "../royale-echarts/src/main/resources/echarts-manifest.xml"
> }
> ],
> "library-path": [
> "${royalelib}/libs/MXRoyaleBase.swc"
> ],
> "js-library-path": [
> "${royalelib}/js/libs/MXRoyaleBaseJS.swc"
> ],
> "define": [
> {
> "name": "BUILD::buildNumber",
> "value": "'buildNumber'"
> },
> {
> "name": "BUILD::buildVersion",
> "value": "'project.version'"
> }
> ],
> "source-map": true
> },
> "files":
> [
> "src/main/royale/App.mxml"
> ]
> }
>
> Hiedra
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com>
> Enviado el: sábado, 21 de mayo de 2022 0:27
> Para: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> Asunto: Re: Royale libraries with JS only
>
> Yes, I can debug with VS Code, however the library (code in SWC) is open
> in JS files and not the AS source code.
> It's not a huge issue, because the similarities between JS and AS.
>
> Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com> escreveu no dia sexta, 20/05/2022
> à(s) 23:11:
>
> > Hugo,
> > Can't debug, can you share your asconfig.json?
> >
> > Do you have debug=true & sourcemap options?
> >
> > Look, this is the asonfig.json of the example project I have published:
> >
> > {
> > "config": "royale",
> > "type": "lib",
> > "compilerOptions": {
> > "debug": true,
> > "targets": ["JSRoyale"],
> > "source-path": [
> > "src/main/royale",
> > "../royale-jscalendar/src/main/royale/"
> > ],
> > "include-namespaces": [
> > "library://ns.apache.org/royale/community"
> > ],
> > "namespace": [
> > {
> > "uri": "library://ns.apache.org/royale/community",
> > "manifest": "src/main/resources/components-manifest.xml"
> > },
> > {
> > "uri": "library://ns.apache.org/royale/community",
> > "manifest":
> > "../royale-jscalendar/src/main/resources/jscalendar-manifest.xml"
> > }
> > ],
> > "include-classes": [
> > "ComponentsClasses"
> > ],
> > "include-sources": [
> > "src/main/royale"
> > ],
> > "library-path": [
> > "${royalelib}/libs/MXRoyaleBase.swc"
> > ],
> > "js-library-path": [
> > "${royalelib}/js/libs/MXRoyaleBaseJS.swc"
> > ],
> > "source-map": true,
> > "remove-circulars": true,
> > "keep-as3-metadata": [
> > "Inject", "Dispatcher", "EventHandler", "PostConstruct",
> > "PreDestroy", "ViewAdded", "ViewRemoved", "Bindable", "Transient"
> > ],
> > "js-default-initializers": true,
> > "output": "target/RoyaleComponentsLib.swc"
> > },
> > "copySourcePathAssets": true,
> > "additionalOptions":
> > [//MXRoyale-${royale.framework.version}-js.swc:defaults.css
> >
> > //"-compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyaleJS.swc:defaults.css",
> > "-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true",
> > "-show-binding-warnings=false"
> > ]
> > }
> >
> > Hiedra
> >
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com> Enviado el: sábado, 21 de
> > mayo de 2022 0:01
> > Para: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> > Asunto: Royale libraries with JS only
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was surprised today that I found that I can compile a library
> > (SWC-JS) with the pure JS version of the framework.
> > I thought that I needed the SWF+JS version to be able to do that.
> > That's a great surprise and usefull to split and reuse comum parts of
> > the code.
> >
> > Since a SWC it's a zip file, what's thw reason to use the library.swf
> > inside of the file ?
> > I guess that the catalog.xml it's used by IDE (on my case VS Code) ?
> >
> > Why not call the file something different like JSL (Java Script
> > Library) or ARL (Apache Royale Library) ?
> >
> > I see that I can easly debug the library with VS Code (that it's
> > expanded on the application project) but I'm debuging you JS only
> > that's not bad but would be great if we can debug the AS3/MXML files
> > => Perhaps a new asconfig.json variable to build with the necessary
> > metadata as source files to debug.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hugo.
> >
>
