Sorry. I had a busy week. I was meaning to test the release. Thanks for getting it done!
> On Mar 29, 2022, at 9:48 AM, Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry, I was confused about the rules (I should have read the email I sent). > It looks like 3 PMC votes are sufficient, and we do have that. I’ll announce > the vote results. > > > From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 9:37 AM > To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4 > > Thank you Greg, Piotr, and Josh. We need one vote more to get this released. > Any volunteers (especially new ones who have not done this yet)? We can guide > you through it if the instructions are not clear. > > > > From: Greg Dove<mailto:greg.d...@gmail.com> > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 2:58 AM > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4 > > Just a couple of notes from me: > > Future improvements in README > --------------------------------------------- > > playerglobal > I think the section on playerglobal should be re-written or removed. The > links to the original Adobe download appear to be no longer working (for > download). And I assume now that as Royale is generating its own > playerglobal.swc (thanks to Josh) it either needs to be updated to mention > that, or the section removed from README (as something that is > special-cased/noteworthy) because it is no longer relevant as an external > dependency. > > Air > Download links do not work for Adobe AIR (but do provide information about > Harman). Should this section be updated? > > > Test of TourDeJewel > --------------------------- > There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven: > While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some > runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top > left). > Error logging observed in js dev console: > Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu > option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just > noting it for attention... > > > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:45 AM Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > wrote: > >> Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I >> mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even >> without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build. However, >> it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just got unlucky >> when I was testing RC3, where it seemed to consistently affect the JS-only >> SDK. This time around, it seems to affect the JS+SWF SDK just as frequently >> on the same machine. >> >> Anyway, I agree with Alex that this issue doesn't need to block the >> release. I'm going to comment out the ASDoc example from the build, and if >> the approval script gets through everything else, I'm happy. I plan to vote >> +1, assuming that my remaining manual tests in VSCode and elsewhere all >> look good too. >> >> -- >> Josh Tynjala >> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:43 AM <apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This is the discussion thread. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Yishay Weiss >> >
