Curiously, I also changed "more easy" to "easier". Did we end up with "easier easier"?
On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote: > ok Andrew, I changed "easier" for "more easy" as Dave suggested, > as you give me green light with Thanks-to, I'll be publishing > thanks! :) > > 2018-04-01 23:20 GMT+02:00 Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]>: > > > Did a quick pass on the IDEs page. Good to go now. > > > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > I will do a text review very shortly > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Carlos, > > >> > > >> Looks good. One comment “more easy” is better as “easier” > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Dave > > >> > > >> > On Apr 1, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Ok Dave, > > >> > > > >> > as I explained in my last email I put two lines for "supported" and > > "not > > >> > supported", let me know what do you think > > >> > > > >> > thanks! > > >> > > > >> > Carlos > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > 2018-04-01 22:31 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <[email protected]>: > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> >>> On Apr 1, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Carlos Rovira < > [email protected]> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Hi, > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Regarding IntelliJ: Piotr uses it for Application development, so > I > > >> think > > >> >>> we can maintain JetBrains thanks to. > > >> >>> But as there's no body using it as an IDE for develop Royale apps, > > and > > >> >>> there's no support, we should remove it from IDEs. > > >> >>> I don't think we should confuse visitors with more explanations, > > >> since a > > >> >>> webpage should be simple and black or white. > > >> >> > > >> >> When it is not black and white then the list needs to be explained > > as a > > >> >> footnote. > > >> >> > > >> >> We really do need to make sure that people know that new or unknown > > >> >> supporters can be added. Apache is a tax free non-profit and must > > >> remain > > >> >> vendor neutrality. > > >> >> > > >> >> Regards, > > >> >> Dave > > >> >> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Regarding thanks to for Prominic and BowlerHat, I agree that > there's > > >> some > > >> >>> kind of relation, maybe not directly related. > > >> >>> We can add them, although is on the limit since is somehow more > > >> related > > >> >> to > > >> >>> its own projects than to Royale, although that projects > > >> >>> reverts in part in our community since users of their IDEs are > users > > >> of > > >> >> our > > >> >>> community. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> So ok, I'll be adding both now and removing IntelliJ from IDEs > > >> >>> > > >> >>> thanks > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Carlos > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> 2018-04-01 21:20 GMT+02:00 Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]>: > > >> >>> > > >> >>>> There are two tiers of IDE support, AIUI: those that just > naturally > > >> >> support > > >> >>>> Royale, and those that can be tricked into supporting it if you > > know > > >> >> what > > >> >>>> you're doing. Maybe we should list both types, explaining the > > >> >> difference? > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 4:11 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala < > > >> >> [email protected]> > > >> >>>> wrote: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018, 10:42 AM Carlos Rovira < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> >>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>> I think IntelliJ doesn't have prime Royale support, but AFAICT > > >> people > > >> >>>> are > > >> >>>>>> using this IDE with some concrete configurations. I think Om is > > >> one of > > >> >>>>>> them. > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> No, Intellij has never worked for me with Royale. Although I do > > use > > >> >>>>> Intellij for all my other development. > > >> >>>>> More than showing our gratitude, I think adding this would just > > >> confuse > > >> >>>> our > > >> >>>>> users. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> I am doing all my SDK and app work using VS Code and the > NextGenAS > > >> >>>> plugin. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> Thanks, > > >> >>>>> Om > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> P.S. I am considering building support for Royale in Intellij > > via a > > >> >>>>> plugin. I will test the waters when I get a chance and see how > > >> hard it > > >> >>>> is. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> Don't know if that could be a problem, but if people are working > > >> with > > >> >>>>>> IntelliJ in some way, although there's no real support (i.e > > Royale > > >> >>>>> project > > >> >>>>>> creation, royale library creation,...) > > >> >>>>>> for me it's ok to list there > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> thanks for your revision! :) > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> Carlos > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> 2018-04-01 19:36 GMT+02:00 Andrew Wetmore <[email protected] > >: > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> Done with my edits. I am not sure whether IntelliJ supports > > >> Royale, > > >> >>>> so > > >> >>>>> I > > >> >>>>>>> just looked at the existing text. > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> a > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 2:26 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala < > > >> >>>>>> [email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> I see IntelliJ in the list. I thought Royale does not work > with > > >> >>>>>> IntelliJ. > > >> >>>>>>>> Unless I missed this development? > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >>>>>>>> Om > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Andrew Wetmore < > > >> >>>> [email protected] > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> I have found the path now. > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Wetmore < > > >> >>>>> [email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> I would do that, but I find the WP structure completely > > >> >>>>> confusing. > > >> >>>>>> I > > >> >>>>>>>>>> cannot find my way to the snippets that make up the pages. > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Carlos Rovira < > > >> >>>>>>> [email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andrew, since you have website access, I think it's > > better > > >> >>>>> that > > >> >>>>>>> you > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> correct in the page directly freely. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> That would be more quick right? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> thanks! > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2018-04-01 18:55 GMT+02:00 Andrew Wetmore < > > >> >>>> [email protected] > > >> >>>>>> : > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> There are a few small issues. I will send an email with > > >> >>>>>> suggested > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> changes > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> in about an hour. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Andrew Wetmore < > > >> >>>>>>> [email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I will take a look > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Carlos Rovira < > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> just put some work to finaly create thanks-to and IDE > > >> >>>>> pages. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Andrew, please can you take a look and correct any > > >> >>>>> spelling > > >> >>>>>>> you > > >> >>>>>>>>> want > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> directly in the website? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://royale.codeoscopic.com/ides/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://royale.codeoscopic.com/thanks-to/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if you miss some company or IDE let me know to include > it > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll be uploading to producing in the next 24-48h > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew Wetmore > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew Wetmore > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Andrew Wetmore > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>>>> Andrew Wetmore > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>>> Andrew Wetmore > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> -- > > >> >>>>>> Carlos Rovira > > >> >>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> -- > > >> >>>> Andrew Wetmore > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > >> >>>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> -- > > >> >>> Carlos Rovira > > >> >>> http://about.me/carlosrovira > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Carlos Rovira > > >> > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > -- Andrew Wetmore http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
