Hi Carlos, Looks good. One comment “more easy” is better as “easier”
Regards, Dave > On Apr 1, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok Dave, > > as I explained in my last email I put two lines for "supported" and "not > supported", let me know what do you think > > thanks! > > Carlos > > > 2018-04-01 22:31 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <[email protected]>: > >> >>> On Apr 1, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Regarding IntelliJ: Piotr uses it for Application development, so I think >>> we can maintain JetBrains thanks to. >>> But as there's no body using it as an IDE for develop Royale apps, and >>> there's no support, we should remove it from IDEs. >>> I don't think we should confuse visitors with more explanations, since a >>> webpage should be simple and black or white. >> >> When it is not black and white then the list needs to be explained as a >> footnote. >> >> We really do need to make sure that people know that new or unknown >> supporters can be added. Apache is a tax free non-profit and must remain >> vendor neutrality. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >>> >>> Regarding thanks to for Prominic and BowlerHat, I agree that there's some >>> kind of relation, maybe not directly related. >>> We can add them, although is on the limit since is somehow more related >> to >>> its own projects than to Royale, although that projects >>> reverts in part in our community since users of their IDEs are users of >> our >>> community. >>> >>> So ok, I'll be adding both now and removing IntelliJ from IDEs >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> Carlos >>> >>> >>> >>> 2018-04-01 21:20 GMT+02:00 Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> There are two tiers of IDE support, AIUI: those that just naturally >> support >>>> Royale, and those that can be tricked into supporting it if you know >> what >>>> you're doing. Maybe we should list both types, explaining the >> difference? >>>> >>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 4:11 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala < >> [email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018, 10:42 AM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think IntelliJ doesn't have prime Royale support, but AFAICT people >>>> are >>>>>> using this IDE with some concrete configurations. I think Om is one of >>>>>> them. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No, Intellij has never worked for me with Royale. Although I do use >>>>> Intellij for all my other development. >>>>> More than showing our gratitude, I think adding this would just confuse >>>> our >>>>> users. >>>>> >>>>> I am doing all my SDK and app work using VS Code and the NextGenAS >>>> plugin. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Om >>>>> >>>>> P.S. I am considering building support for Royale in Intellij via a >>>>> plugin. I will test the waters when I get a chance and see how hard it >>>> is. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Don't know if that could be a problem, but if people are working with >>>>>> IntelliJ in some way, although there's no real support (i.e Royale >>>>> project >>>>>> creation, royale library creation,...) >>>>>> for me it's ok to list there >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks for your revision! :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Carlos >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2018-04-01 19:36 GMT+02:00 Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Done with my edits. I am not sure whether IntelliJ supports Royale, >>>> so >>>>> I >>>>>>> just looked at the existing text. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> a >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 2:26 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala < >>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I see IntelliJ in the list. I thought Royale does not work with >>>>>> IntelliJ. >>>>>>>> Unless I missed this development? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Om >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Andrew Wetmore < >>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have found the path now. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Wetmore < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I would do that, but I find the WP structure completely >>>>> confusing. >>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>> cannot find my way to the snippets that make up the pages. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Carlos Rovira < >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andrew, since you have website access, I think it's better >>>>> that >>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>> correct in the page directly freely. >>>>>>>>>>> That would be more quick right? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> thanks! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2018-04-01 18:55 GMT+02:00 Andrew Wetmore < >>>> [email protected] >>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There are a few small issues. I will send an email with >>>>>> suggested >>>>>>>>>>> changes >>>>>>>>>>>> in about an hour. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Andrew Wetmore < >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I will take a look >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Carlos Rovira < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> just put some work to finaly create thanks-to and IDE >>>>> pages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Andrew, please can you take a look and correct any >>>>> spelling >>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>>>>>> directly in the website? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://royale.codeoscopic.com/ides/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://royale.codeoscopic.com/thanks-to/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if you miss some company or IDE let me know to include it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll be uploading to producing in the next 24-48h >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew Wetmore >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew Wetmore >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira >>>>>>>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Andrew Wetmore >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Andrew Wetmore >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Andrew Wetmore >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Carlos Rovira >>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Andrew Wetmore >>>> >>>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Carlos Rovira >>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >> >> > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
