View is generally the top level div in the app. I do like having something as identifying the content as a royale app, although it could probably be on Application instead of View.
Harbs > On Mar 27, 2018, at 9:07 PM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote: > > btw, I think typeName for View should be "View" win order to be coherent > with the rest of classes > > 2018-03-27 20:06 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: > >> Ok, I was reading old FlexJS email from Peter about Group, Container.. but >> don't talk about View. >> >> What's the main difference between Group, Conatiner and View? normaly I >> use Group, but maybe I should use View... >> Container seems the same as Group... >> >> 2018-03-27 18:31 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: >> >>> >>> >>> On 3/27/18, 2:56 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos Rovira" >>> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> just wondering why "View" has typenames="royale" >>>> while Application is "Application or Group is "Group" >>>> Why View is not "View"? >>> >>> Because it is meant to act as the top of the DOM and it seemed more >>> obvious to tell folks to update the "royale" class to get universal style >>> changes. View might get re-used in other context and may not always be >>> top-level. Flex Mobile apps had ViewNavigators and stuff like that. If >>> other folks want to change it, that's fine with me. >>> >>> -Alex >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Carlos Rovira >> http://about.me/carlosrovira >> >> > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira
