btw, I think typeName for View should be "View" win order to be coherent with the rest of classes
2018-03-27 20:06 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: > Ok, I was reading old FlexJS email from Peter about Group, Container.. but > don't talk about View. > > What's the main difference between Group, Conatiner and View? normaly I > use Group, but maybe I should use View... > Container seems the same as Group... > > 2018-03-27 18:31 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: > >> >> >> On 3/27/18, 2:56 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos Rovira" >> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> > >> >just wondering why "View" has typenames="royale" >> >while Application is "Application or Group is "Group" >> >Why View is not "View"? >> >> Because it is meant to act as the top of the DOM and it seemed more >> obvious to tell folks to update the "royale" class to get universal style >> changes. View might get re-used in other context and may not always be >> top-level. Flex Mobile apps had ViewNavigators and stuff like that. If >> other folks want to change it, that's fine with me. >> >> -Alex >> >> > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
