The vote is approved with 4 binding votes and close now.
Votes:
- Yunze Xu(binding)
- Baodi Shi(binding)
- Yubiao Feng(binding)
- Lari Hotari(binding)
- Zixuan Liu(non-binding)
- Tao Jiuming(non-binding)

Thank you all for verifying and voting!
Wenzhi Feng.

On 2025/03/03 02:45:07 WenZhi Feng wrote:
> Hi, Lari. thanks for your feedback, i reply your comments in the 
> implementation pr.
> We may close this vote thread and continue the discussion in the pr.
> 
> Thanks.
> Wenzhi Feng.
> 
> On 2025/02/28 14:38:25 Lari Hotari wrote:
> > +1 (binding), with implementation level detail change suggestion.
> > 
> > I didn't have a chance to review this before the voting started due to
> > being busy with urgent Pulsar releases 3.0.10, 3.3.5 and 4.0.3.
> > I have provided a suggestion to change in an implementation detail.
> > Instead of using java.util.function.Function, I'd suggest using a
> > richer interface so that more context parameters can be added besides
> > the topic name. This pattern would also allow adding more context
> > parameters later without breaking the API in backwards incompatible
> > ways.
> > 
> > This feedback is shared in the review of the implementation PR,
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/24020#discussion_r1975495488.
> > 
> > I'm looking forward to this improvement which will resolve the long
> > time issues such as https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19463 and
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/21954.
> > 
> > Great work, Wenzhi. Thanks for making this happen!
> > 
> > -Lari
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 at 06:02, thetumbled <wof...@qq.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, Pulsar Community.
> > >   I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-409: support producer 
> > > configuration for retry/dead letter topic producer.
> > >   pip link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/24022
> > >   implementation link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/24020
> > >   Discussion Thread: 
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/h6jjf9wn2h4zmpjw5zjtnl5ds1r4nknq
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Wenzhi Feng
> > 
> 

Reply via email to