On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 at 14:26, Yubiao Feng <yubiao.f...@streamnative.io.invalid> wrote: > > Isn't the typical way to handle regressions and bugs to fix them? > > It may have other potential issues. > > > I don't see a sensible argument for changing configuration defaults for > 4.0.2 . > > Is there a PIP related to #9292, which defined the default behavior has > been changed?
We have already made releases 4.0.0 and 4.0.1 with the changed defaults. Changing it now is too late. PR 9292 has been approved by the community and there have been discussions in the past. I don't see why we would be postponing such an important improvement to Pulsar 5.0 . Let's fix any possible regressions asap and adapt. -Lari
