Hi Lari > Isn't the typical way to handle regressions and bugs to fix them?
It may have other potential issues. > I don't see a sensible argument for changing configuration defaults for 4.0.2 . Is there a PIP related to #9292, which defined the default behavior has been changed? On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 3:25 PM Lari Hotari <lhot...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2024/12/30 02:15:52 Yubiao Feng wrote: > > Hi Lari > > > > > I disagree on making a change to the Pulsar 4.0 default value since > > Pulsar 4.0 has already been released. > > > > Since PR #9292 introduced a regression, we'd better make it the default > > carefully. We can change it as default-enabled at the following feature > > releases > > Isn't the typical way to handle regressions and bugs to fix them? > I don't see a sensible argument for changing configuration defaults for > 4.0.2 . > Instead, let's document configuration recommendations in a separate Pulsar > 4.0 upgrade guide for users that are concerned about losing individual ack > state if there's a need to downgrade from 4.0 to 3.0. > > -Lari >
