I submitted the PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/843
Best, Kiryl > On Mar 10, 2024, at 10:02 PM, Kiryl Valkovich <visorte...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Asaf and Dave, thank you for your responses. > > The proposed version menu structure looks good to me: > - Next > - active versions still in support > - Others > > If there will be no more input, I’m going to submit the PR in the upcoming > week. > > I updated the redirect and the release process instructions. Please review > the PR: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/836 > > > Best, > Kiryl > >> On Mar 10, 2024, at 9:06 PM, Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> I like the notion of not updating documentation for versions that are out of >> EOL unless the documentation is incorrect. >> >> The only versions that should be on the documentation pop-up on >> https:/pulsar.apache.org/docs/x,y,z/ <http://pulsar.apache.org/docs/x,y,z/> >> should be: >> - Next >> - active versions still in support >> - Others >> >> Should the PMC release a version out of support like is happening with >> 2.10.x and 2.11.x. Documentation may be updated, but it should remain >> “Others” >> >> Also, please look into the redirect on https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/ >> <https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/> is currently redirecting to >> https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/3.1.x/ >> <https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/3.1.x/> is that what is desired? >> >> Best, >> Dave >> >>> On Mar 6, 2024, at 3:56 AM, Kiryl Valkovich <visorte...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Idea: don't require updating versioned docs from contributors. >>> Making a small documentation fix in a single place is easy, but if we ask >>> contributors to fix it in 5-10 places, it may prevent the initiative at all. >>> >>> It could increase the amount of contributions to the documentation. >>> >>> I'm not sure how to better organize this process. Who should do this job - >>> the PR reviewer or someone else like a technical writer? >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> Kiryl >>> >>>> On Mar 5, 2024, at 12:15 AM, Kiryl Valkovich <visorte...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> The release policy page states that Pulsar has two supported versions on >>>> the current date. >>>> The documentation site provides four versions to choose from in the >>>> dropdown list. If some of them aren't actively supported, should they also >>>> be updated? >>>> >>>> GitHub issue with more details and screenshots: >>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/22177 >>>> >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Kiryl >>> >>> >> >
