Asaf and Dave, thank you for your responses. The proposed version menu structure looks good to me: - Next - active versions still in support - Others
If there will be no more input, I’m going to submit the PR in the upcoming week. I updated the redirect and the release process instructions. Please review the PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/836 Best, Kiryl > On Mar 10, 2024, at 9:06 PM, Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: > > I like the notion of not updating documentation for versions that are out of > EOL unless the documentation is incorrect. > > The only versions that should be on the documentation pop-up on > https:/pulsar.apache.org/docs/x,y,z/ <http://pulsar.apache.org/docs/x,y,z/> > should be: > - Next > - active versions still in support > - Others > > Should the PMC release a version out of support like is happening with 2.10.x > and 2.11.x. Documentation may be updated, but it should remain “Others” > > Also, please look into the redirect on https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/ > <https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/> is currently redirecting to > https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/3.1.x/ <https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/3.1.x/> > is that what is desired? > > Best, > Dave > >> On Mar 6, 2024, at 3:56 AM, Kiryl Valkovich <visorte...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Idea: don't require updating versioned docs from contributors. >> Making a small documentation fix in a single place is easy, but if we ask >> contributors to fix it in 5-10 places, it may prevent the initiative at all. >> >> It could increase the amount of contributions to the documentation. >> >> I'm not sure how to better organize this process. Who should do this job - >> the PR reviewer or someone else like a technical writer? >> >> >> Best, >> Kiryl >> >>> On Mar 5, 2024, at 12:15 AM, Kiryl Valkovich <visorte...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> The release policy page states that Pulsar has two supported versions on >>> the current date. >>> The documentation site provides four versions to choose from in the >>> dropdown list. If some of them aren't actively supported, should they also >>> be updated? >>> >>> GitHub issue with more details and screenshots: >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/22177 >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> Kiryl >> >> >
