Hi, Enrico, > On the other side we should not encourage people to use 'latest' in production as because it is by design unpredictable.
Agree. Fortunately, for the current document, we don't encourage people to use 'latest', We specify the specific version when starting the Pulsar docker in the doc. https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/next/getting-started-docker/ > Honestly it would be better to not have a 'latest' tag. Lack of the latest tag makes it less user-friendly and less intuitive for the user. For most users who are new to Pulsar, they can just start the Pulsar container without having to know beforehand what version of Pulsar is out there. I think we still need the latest tag. Just want to make sure do you +1 for this PR? https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/745 Thanks, Zike Yang On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 7:50 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The first option is better, as it allows people to try out the latest > features and hopefully it is more stable. > > On the other side we should not encourage people to use 'latest' in > production as because it is by design unpredictable. Let's day that you > have a system that had been running for a year, then you restart it and the > system picks a new major release (say from 3.0 to 4 > 0), then you have no control over the new defaults or about dropped > features. > > Honestly it would be better to not have a 'latest' tag. > > Enrico > > Il Mar 12 Dic 2023, 08:41 Zike Yang <z...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > > Hi, penghui > > > > > Is it better to introduce a `lts` or `lts-latest` tag to the images? > > > > Good idea. I would prefer the `lts` tag. I have updated the PR for this. > > > > Thanks, > > Zike Yang > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:43 AM PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > +1 for the first way. > > > > > > Is it better to introduce a `lts` or `lts-latest` tag to the images? > > > Users can use the new tag if they want to get the latest LTS version. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Penghui > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:09 AM Zike Yang <z...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks to all of you. > > > > > > > > I believe we have reached an agreement on this. Could you help review > > > > the PR? https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/745 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Zike Yang > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 12:11 PM Zixuan Liu <node...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Zike, > > > > > > > > > > > I prefer the 1st way as well. > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Zixuan > > > > > > > > > > Yunze Xu <x...@apache.org> 于2023年12月5日周二 20:26写道： > > > > > > > > > > > I prefer the 1st way as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Yunze > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 5:11 PM Zike Yang <z...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There seems to be a gap in our current release process > > concerning the > > > > > > > pushing of the latest tag to our Docker images. Specifically, we > > need > > > > > > > to decide which version of Pulsar the latest tag should point to. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have come up with two options: > > > > > > > 1. The latest tag could point to the most recent feature release > > or > > > > > > > the subsequent patch of that feature release. For instance, it > > could > > > > > > > currently point to 3.1.1, and in the future, it could point to > > 3.1.2 > > > > > > > or 3.2.0. > > > > > > > 2. The latest tag could point to the most recent LTS release or > > the > > > > > > > subsequent patch of that LTS release. As an example, it could > > > > > > > currently point to 3.0.2, and in the future, it could point to > > 3.0.3 > > > > > > > or 4.0.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? I would prefer the option 1. I have pushed a > > PR to > > > > > > > update the release docker image process: > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/745. > > > > > > > PTAL and leave your comments and feedback here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Zike Yang > > > > > > > > > > > >
