Thanks to all of you. I believe we have reached an agreement on this. Could you help review the PR? https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/745
Thanks, Zike Yang On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 12:11 PM Zixuan Liu <node...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Zike, > > > I prefer the 1st way as well. > +1 > > Thanks, > Zixuan > > Yunze Xu <x...@apache.org> 于2023年12月5日周二 20:26写道： > > > I prefer the 1st way as well. > > > > Thanks, > > Yunze > > > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 5:11 PM Zike Yang <z...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, everyone, > > > > > > There seems to be a gap in our current release process concerning the > > > pushing of the latest tag to our Docker images. Specifically, we need > > > to decide which version of Pulsar the latest tag should point to. > > > > > > I have come up with two options: > > > 1. The latest tag could point to the most recent feature release or > > > the subsequent patch of that feature release. For instance, it could > > > currently point to 3.1.1, and in the future, it could point to 3.1.2 > > > or 3.2.0. > > > 2. The latest tag could point to the most recent LTS release or the > > > subsequent patch of that LTS release. As an example, it could > > > currently point to 3.0.2, and in the future, it could point to 3.0.3 > > > or 4.0.0. > > > > > > What do you think? I would prefer the option 1. I have pushed a PR to > > > update the release docker image process: > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/745. > > > PTAL and leave your comments and feedback here. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Zike Yang > >
