Hi all,

We only use the BC to encrypt the message, not TLS, so I think we can
migrate to the BC-FIPS.

If you think it's feasible, I'll try to do it, and if it doesn't pass the
Pulsar test, I'll keep using the BC.

Thanks,
Zixuan



YuWei Sung <yuwei.s...@streamnative.io.invalid> 于2023年3月2日周四 00:40写道:

> BC and BC-FIPS differences are the cipher suites. This is similar to TLS1.1
> vs 1.2 vs 1.3. Some suites are deprecated (not secured enough due to
> compute power improvement).
> in TLS 1.3, client has no chance to specific weak cipher suites to connect
> to server and exploit the weakness.
> For BC-FIPS harden pulsar cluster, brokers should reject connections from
> clients with BC (clients must use Security.provider bc-fips).
> For BC non fips cluster, it should be flexible. client with bc-fips or bc
> should be able to connect to pulsar (bc).
>
> <https://streamnative.io>
>
>
> Yu Wei Sung
>
> Sr. Solutions Engineer
>
>
> streamnative.io
>
> <http://github.com/streamnative>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/streamnative/>
> <https://twitter.com/streamnativeio/>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 10:28 AM Zixuan Liu <node...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Actually I was expecting that part of the discussion will specify the
> > > difference between using FIPS compared with non-FIPS, in each
> > BouncyCastle
> > > usage: TLS and message encryption.
> >
> > Good catch! I'll check this.
> >
> > Asaf Mesika <asaf.mes...@gmail.com> 于2023年3月1日周三 21:19写道:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 4:35 PM Zixuan Liu <node...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > users might get exceptions if they don't use specific algorithms or
> > > > encryption schemes?
> > > >
> > > > Could you share more info about this?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Actually I was expecting that part of the discussion will specify the
> > > difference between using FIPS compared with non-FIPS, in each
> > BouncyCastle
> > > usage: TLS and message encryption.
> > >
> > >  I imagined that FIPS has a shorter list of ciphers it supports.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Asaf Mesika <asaf.mes...@gmail.com> 于2023年2月27日周一 18:01写道:
> > > >
> > > > > So if I understand you correctly, once you switch to the FIPS
> version
> > > of
> > > > > Bouncy Castle, users might get exceptions if they don't use
> specific
> > > > > algorithms or encryption schemes?
> > > > > Potentially a breaking change?
> > > > > You can't switch it off via config?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 3:56 PM Zixuan Liu <node...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. What is FIPS?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FIPS (Federal Information Processing Standards) are a set of
> > > standards
> > > > > that
> > > > > > describe document processing, encryption algorithms and other
> > > > information
> > > > > > technology standards for use within non-military government
> > agencies
> > > > and
> > > > > by
> > > > > > government contractors and vendors who work with the agencies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. Why is the FIPS version safer exactly?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FIPS standard is strict. When using the FIPS version, this is
> also
> > > very
> > > > > > strict and standard.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3. What is bouncycastle used exactly in Pulsar?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We use the bouncycastle as the TLS provider,  and used for the
> > > > end-to-end
> > > > > > message encryption.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Zixuan
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Asaf Mesika <asaf.mes...@gmail.com> 于2023年2月22日周三 21:23写道:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can you elaborate a bit:
> > > > > > > 1. What is FIPS?
> > > > > > > 2. Why is the FIPS version safer exactly?
> > > > > > > 3. What is bouncycastle used exactly in Pulsar?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:58 AM Zixuan Liu <node...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I would like to discuss using the bouncycastle fips instead
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > > > bouncycastle non-fips.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The bouncycastle is a Java library that complements the
> default
> > > > Java
> > > > > > > > Cryptographic Extension (JCE), which has two versions: fips
> > > version
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > non-fips version.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The fips version is safer than non-fips. When the security
> > level
> > > is
> > > > > > very
> > > > > > > > high, many policies require the fips version, but the Pulsar
> > > > default
> > > > > > uses
> > > > > > > > the non-fips version. Switch this is complex, because
> > > > > > > > the `pulsar-client-messagecrypto-bc` module and root project
> > > > depends
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > non-fips, so I suggest we switch to fips version from
> non-fips.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Reference:
> > > > > > > > - https://www.bouncycastle.org/
> > > > > > > > - https://www.bouncycastle.org/fips_faq.html
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > >
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Information_Processing_Standards
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Zixuan
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to