Abstraction based on MessageIdData is a good solution. I don't have any discussion context. Why don't we put the topic name in it?
All I can think of is PulsarApiMessageId extend TopicMessageId(PIP-224[1]) right? Thanks, Bo [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18616 Yunze Xu <y...@streamnative.io.invalid> 于2022年12月16日周五 15:59写道： > > Hi all, > > I've opened a PIP to discuss: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18950 > > Currently the `MessageId` interface is not friendly to developers of > Pulsar core and ecosystems. There is no abstraction of the > `MessageIdData` defined in `PulsarApi.proto`. > > This proposal aims at solving this problem and allows more loose type > assertions when using `seek` and `acknowledge`. > > You can also see the demo for reference: > https://github.com/BewareMyPower/pulsar/pull/11 > > (Sorry I forgot to add the [DISCUSS] prefix again in the previous > email, let's continue the discussion here) > > Thanks, > Yunze
