Hi Sorry for the late release, we need to wait for the 2 fixes on the BK side.
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3523 https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3528 Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 6:02 AM Christophe Bornet <bornet.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > The blockers mentioned by Nicolo seem to have been fixed. > Is there still something blocking the release ? > > Le mer. 28 sept. 2022 à 15:36, Nicolò Boschi <boschi1...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > I've found another release blocker about client compatibility with > jdk8/11, > > please review https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17873 > > > > Nicolò Boschi > > > > > > Il giorno ven 16 set 2022 alle ore 10:54 Nicolò Boschi < > > boschi1...@gmail.com> > > ha scritto: > > > > > Actually Yong found the root cause of the issue, see > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/d9gm50kysgjcpbq448s2sy822kho6z6k - > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3480 > > > The issue only appears if "numReadWorkerThreads" is set to zero, which > is > > > a non-sense config in a production environment. > > > > > > > > > But I found another release blocker here: > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17690 > > > > > > After that, I think we should go forward and continue with the release. > > > Pulsar 2.11 will contain awesome features and we already have held it > too > > > much based on the release schedule. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Nicolò Boschi > > > > > > > > > Il giorno mar 13 set 2022 alle ore 10:02 Nicolò Boschi < > > > boschi1...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > > > >> The only blocker now should be > > >> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/17520 > > >> The description says that reverting BK to 4.15.0, the issue seems > > >> resolved. > > >> > > >> If so, I think we should revert the BK upgrade and then go forward > with > > >> Pulsar 2.11.0. > > >> > > >> I know that there are some suspects of a regression in BK 4.15.0 > raised > > >> by the Pravega team (https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3466 > ) > > >> but we can't wait for them. > > >> We don't know if the same issue applies to Pulsar and the time for: > find > > >> the issue - fix it - cut a release may be weeks or months. > > >> > > >> > > >> Nicolò Boschi > > >> > > >> > > >> Il giorno lun 5 set 2022 alle ore 14:03 Enrico Olivelli < > > >> eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > >> > > >>> Got it > > >>> thanks fro the update and also thanks for being so careful in > > >>> following the issues > > >>> and we are finding on Pulsar > > >>> > > >>> Il giorno lun 5 set 2022 alle ore 13:00 guo jiwei > > >>> <techno...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > >>> > > > >>> > Hi dev, > > >>> > We find two new issues[1] that block the release. > > >>> > After the two issues are resolved, I will start the release. > > >>> > > > >>> > [1] : https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17474 > > >>> > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3466 > > >>> > > >>> This is a BookKeeper bug, so it will take much time to see it fixed > > >>> and released in order to be > > >>> consumed by Pulsar. > > >>> > > >>> The issue was reported on Pravega, that uses BK in a very different > > way. > > >>> I am not sure that we have to hold off this release waiting for > > >>> feedback on that issue > > >>> > > >>> The 2.11 release was due to August, before PulsarSummit > > >>> > > >>> any other opinions from the community ? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Enrico > > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > Regards > > >>> > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:02 AM guo jiwei <techno...@apache.org> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > > Hi Anon > > >>> > > After we cut the branch, the code freezed. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Regards > > >>> > > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 9:45 PM Anon Hxy <anonhx...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > > > >>> > >> Hi jiwei > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> Sorry for late reply. I'd like to add PIP189 to 2.11.0, is it > > >>> possible > > >>> > >> now > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> - PIP 189: No batching if only one message in batch. > > >>> > >> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16605 > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> Thanks, > > >>> > >> Xiaoyu Hou > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> guo jiwei <techno...@apache.org> 于2022年8月24日周三 10:16写道： > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > Hi all, > > >>> > >> > We have merged all the blocker patches, and I decide to > start > > >>> the > > >>> > >> > release. > > >>> > >> > The release note[1] for 2.11.0 is available for review, > > please > > >>> help > > >>> > >> > review it and feel free to leave comments. > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/167 > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > Regards > > >>> > >> > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:43 PM Enrico Olivelli < > > >>> eolive...@gmail.com> > > >>> > >> > wrote: > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > This test is blocking all the PRs and so it is blocking the > > >>> release: > > >>> > >> > > Error: Tests run: 9, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 3, > Time > > >>> elapsed: > > >>> > >> > > 21.724 s <<< FAILURE! - in > > >>> > >> > > org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.MultiTopicsConsumerImplTest > > >>> > >> > > 3681 Error: > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > >>> > > > testParallelSubscribeAsync(org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.MultiTopicsConsumerImplTest) > > >>> > >> > > Time elapsed: 5.05 s <<< FAILURE! > > >>> > >> > > org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > >>> > > > org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.MultiTopicsConsumerImplTest.testParallelSubscribeAsync() > > >>> > >> > > didn't finish within the time-out 5000 > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > Enrico > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > Il giorno mer 17 ago 2022 alle ore 14:40 Nicolò Boschi > > >>> > >> > > <boschi1...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > This is another blocker for 2.11.0 for a regression about > > >>> streaming > > >>> > >> > > > dispatch that I found in the 2.11 branch > > >>> > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17143 > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > Nicolò Boschi > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > Il giorno mer 17 ago 2022 alle ore 11:45 Enrico Olivelli < > > >>> > >> > > > eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > We have this release blocker PR that is waiting for CI > > >>> > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17118 > > >>> > >> > > > > the problem is about a new API that has been introduced > in > > >>> 2.11 > > >>> > >> but > > >>> > >> > > > > the API has a little problem and we must fix it before > the > > >>> API to > > >>> > >> be > > >>> > >> > > > > released to the public > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > Enrico > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > Il giorno mar 16 ago 2022 alle ore 10:13 guo jiwei > > >>> > >> > > > > <techno...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > Thanks for Yunze's help for fixing rpm and deb > > packaging. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > Regards > > >>> > >> > > > > > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 11:02 PM Yunze Xu > > >>> > >> > > <y...@streamnative.io.invalid> > > >>> > >> > > > > > wrote: > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > I found the scripts to build rpm and deb packages > are > > >>> broken, > > >>> > >> see > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > >>> > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Release-process#31-build-rpm-and-deb-packages > > >>> > >> > > > > > > . > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > It's caused by > > >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15376 > > >>> > >> and > > >>> > >> > > only > > >>> > >> > > > > > > affects the 2.11.0 release and higher versions. It > > >>> should be a > > >>> > >> > > blocker > > >>> > >> > > > > > > for 2.11.0 release. I'm working on this issue at the > > >>> moment > > >>> > >> and > > >>> > >> > > going > > >>> > >> > > > > > > to push a fix soon, as well as the CI to protect the > > >>> rpm/deb > > >>> > >> > > packaging > > >>> > >> > > > > > > to avoid the regression. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > Thanks, > > >>> > >> > > > > > > Yunze > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > 2022年8月4日 23:44，guo jiwei <techno...@apache.org> > > 写道： > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > Hi all, > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > Put an update here, we have created > branch-2.11[1]. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/tree/branch-2.11 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > Regards > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 10:59 AM Zixuan Liu < > > >>> > >> node...@gmail.com > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > wrote: > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> +1 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> Thanks, > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> Zixuan > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> Yunze Xu <y...@streamnative.io.invalid> > > >>> 于2022年7月26日周二 > > >>> > >> > 23:34写道： > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> I opened a PR > > >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16803 > > >>> > >> > that > > >>> > >> > > > > might > > >>> > >> > > > > > > be > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> the blocker > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> of the release of 2.11.0, PTAL. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> Yunze > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> 2022年7月22日 18:21，Zixuan Liu <node...@gmail.com > > > > >>> 写道： > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> +1 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks, > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> Zixuan > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > >>> 于2022年7月22日周五 > > >>> > >> > 18:06写道： > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> Il giorno ven 22 lug 2022 alle ore 12:05 guo > > jiwei > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> <techno...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> I will take the release > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> Thanks ! > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> Enrico > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> Regards > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 12:37 AM Nicolò > Boschi > > < > > >>> > >> > > > > > > boschi1...@gmail.com > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> I understand the need for the Pulsar Summit. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> In that case I have to step back because I > > will > > >>> be > > >>> > >> > offline > > >>> > >> > > for > > >>> > >> > > > > the > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> next few > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> weeks > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Sorry > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Nicolò Boschi > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Il Gio 21 Lug 2022, 06:32 PengHui Li < > > >>> > >> peng...@apache.org > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > ha > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> scritto: > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for volunteering Nicolò. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> So a plan could be to try to merge the > work > > in > > >>> > >> progress > > >>> > >> > > > > targeted > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> for > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2.11 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> by the mid of August and then start the > code > > >>> > >> freezing as > > >>> > >> > > > > described > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> in the > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> PIP. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> So the target release date will be early > > >>> September. > > >>> > >> One > > >>> > >> > > point > > >>> > >> > > > > is > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> Pulsar > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Summit > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> San Francisco will start on August 18, > 2022. > > I > > >>> think > > >>> > >> > > maybe we > > >>> > >> > > > > can > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> start > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> to > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> test > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the master branch for now and continue the > > >>> > >> in-progress > > >>> > >> > > tasks. > > >>> > >> > > > > If > > >>> > >> > > > > > > we > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> can > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> have a > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> major release before Pulsar Summit, it > should > > >>> be good > > >>> > >> > > news to > > >>> > >> > > > > the > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Community. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Penghui > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:06 PM Enrico > > >>> Olivelli < > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> eolive...@gmail.com > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Nicolò, > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Il Lun 18 Lug 2022, 10:00 Nicolò Boschi < > > >>> > >> > > > > boschi1...@gmail.com> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > ha > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> scritto: > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Penghui for the reminder. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I'd like to also include PIP: 181 Pulsar > > >>> shell if > > >>> > >> the > > >>> > >> > > time > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> permits. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I believe that is a good idea to start > > >>> testing the > > >>> > >> > code > > >>> > >> > > > > freeze > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> proposed > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> by > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> PIP-175 ( > > >>> > >> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15966 > > >>> > >> > > ). > > >>> > >> > > > > Even > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> if not > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> officially approved, we discussed it many > > >>> times and > > >>> > >> > > agreed > > >>> > >> > > > > to > > >>> > >> > > > > > > the > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> usefulness of the code freezing. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Great idea! > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We should really try it > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> So a plan could be to try to merge the > work > > in > > >>> > >> progress > > >>> > >> > > > > targeted > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> for > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2.11 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> by the mid of August and then start the > > code > > >>> > >> freezing > > >>> > >> > as > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> described in > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> PIP. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Also, I volunteer for driving the release > > if > > >>> nobody > > >>> > >> > > else is > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> interested > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for volunteering > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Enrico > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Nicolò Boschi > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Il giorno lun 18 lug 2022 alle ore 06:59 > > >>> Yunze Xu > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> <y...@streamnative.io.invalid> ha > scritto: > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> In addition to #16202, there is a > > following > > >>> PR to > > >>> > >> > > support > > >>> > >> > > > > the > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> correct > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ACK implementation for chunked messages. > > It > > >>> should > > >>> > >> > > depend > > >>> > >> > > > > on > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> #16202 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> But I think I can submit an initial PR > > this > > >>> week > > >>> > >> and > > >>> > >> > > > > change the > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> tests > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> after #16202 is merged. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Yunze > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2022年7月18日 11:22，PengHui Li < > > >>> peng...@apache.org> > > >>> > >> > 写道： > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> We released 2.10.0 three months ago. > And > > >>> there > > >>> > >> are > > >>> > >> > > many > > >>> > >> > > > > great > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> changes > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> in > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the master branch, > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> including new features and performance > > >>> > >> improvements. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - PIP 74: apply client memory to > consumer > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15216 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - PIP 143: Support split bundles by > > >>> specified > > >>> > >> > > boundaries > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/13796 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - PIP 145: regex subscription > > improvements > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16062 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - PIP 160: transaction performance > > >>> improvements > > >>> > >> > > (still in > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> progress > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> and > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> merged some PRs) > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - PIP 161: new exclusive producer mode > > >>> support > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15488 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - PIP 182: Provide new load balance > > >>> placement > > >>> > >> > strategy > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> implementation > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> for > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ModularLoadManagerStrategy > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16281 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Add Pulsar Auth support for the Pulsar > > SQL > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15571 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> And some features are blocked in the > > review > > >>> > >> stage, > > >>> > >> > but > > >>> > >> > > > > they > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> are > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> powerful > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> improvements for Pulsar > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> PIP 37: Support chunking with Shared > > >>> subscription > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16202 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> PIP-166: Function add MANUAL delivery > > >>> semantics > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16279 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find the complete change list > in > > >>> 2.11.0 > > >>> > >> at > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > >>> > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A2.11.0+-label%3Arelease%2F2.10.1+-label%3Arelease%2F2.10.2 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> And maybe I missed some important > > >>> in-progress > > >>> > >> PRs, > > >>> > >> > > please > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> let me > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> know > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> if > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> it > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> should be a blocker of the 2.11.0 > > release. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> It's a good time to discuss the target > > >>> time of > > >>> > >> the > > >>> > >> > > 2.11.0 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> release. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can leave 2 weeks to > complete > > >>> the > > >>> > >> > > in-progress > > >>> > >> > > > > PRs > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> and > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2 > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> weeks > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> accept bug fixes. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> And target the 2.11.0 release in > > >>> mid-August. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know what you think. > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Penghui > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >> > > >
