Hi  dev,
    We find two new issues[1] that block the release.
    After the two issues are resolved, I will start the release.

[1] : https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17474
       https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3466

Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)


On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:02 AM guo jiwei <techno...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi  Anon
>    After we cut the branch, the code freezed.
>
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 9:45 PM Anon Hxy <anonhx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi jiwei
>>
>> Sorry for late reply.  I'd like to add PIP189 to 2.11.0, is it possible
>> now
>>
>> - PIP 189: No batching if only one message in batch.
>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16605
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Xiaoyu Hou
>>
>> guo jiwei <techno...@apache.org> 于2022年8月24日周三 10:16写道:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >    We have merged all the blocker patches, and I decide to start the
>> > release.
>> >    The release note[1] for 2.11.0 is available for review, please help
>> > review it and feel free to leave comments.
>> >
>> >
>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/167
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:43 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > This test is blocking all the PRs and so it is blocking the release:
>> > > Error: Tests run: 9, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 3, Time elapsed:
>> > > 21.724 s <<< FAILURE! - in
>> > > org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.MultiTopicsConsumerImplTest
>> > > 3681 Error:
>> > >
>> >
>> testParallelSubscribeAsync(org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.MultiTopicsConsumerImplTest)
>> > > Time elapsed: 5.05 s <<< FAILURE!
>> > > org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.MultiTopicsConsumerImplTest.testParallelSubscribeAsync()
>> > > didn't finish within the time-out 5000
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Enrico
>> > >
>> > > Il giorno mer 17 ago 2022 alle ore 14:40 Nicolò Boschi
>> > > <boschi1...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>> > > >
>> > > > This is another blocker for 2.11.0 for a regression about streaming
>> > > > dispatch that I found in the 2.11 branch
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17143
>> > > >
>> > > > Nicolò Boschi
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Il giorno mer 17 ago 2022 alle ore 11:45 Enrico Olivelli <
>> > > > eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>> > > >
>> > > > > We have this release blocker PR that is waiting for CI
>> > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17118
>> > > > > the problem is about a new API that has been introduced in 2.11
>> but
>> > > > > the API has a little problem and we must fix it before the API to
>> be
>> > > > > released to the public
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Enrico
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Il giorno mar 16 ago 2022 alle ore 10:13 guo jiwei
>> > > > > <techno...@apache.org> ha scritto:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks for Yunze's help for fixing rpm and deb packaging.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Regards
>> > > > > > Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 11:02 PM Yunze Xu
>> > > <y...@streamnative.io.invalid>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I found the scripts to build rpm and deb packages are broken,
>> see
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Release-process#31-build-rpm-and-deb-packages
>> > > > > > > .
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > It's caused by https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15376
>> and
>> > > only
>> > > > > > > affects the 2.11.0 release and higher versions. It should be a
>> > > blocker
>> > > > > > > for 2.11.0 release. I'm working on this issue at the moment
>> and
>> > > going
>> > > > > > > to push a fix soon, as well as the CI to protect the rpm/deb
>> > > packaging
>> > > > > > > to avoid the regression.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > Yunze
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > 2022年8月4日 23:44,guo jiwei <techno...@apache.org> 写道:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Put an update here, we have created branch-2.11[1].
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/tree/branch-2.11
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Regards
>> > > > > > > > Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 10:59 AM Zixuan Liu <
>> node...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> +1
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >> Zixuan
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Yunze Xu <y...@streamnative.io.invalid> 于2022年7月26日周二
>> > 23:34写道:
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>> I opened a PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16803
>> > that
>> > > > > might
>> > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > >>> the blocker
>> > > > > > > >>> of the release of 2.11.0, PTAL.
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >>> Yunze
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>>> 2022年7月22日 18:21,Zixuan Liu <node...@gmail.com> 写道:
>> > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>> +1
>> > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >>>> Zixuan
>> > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>> Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> 于2022年7月22日周五
>> > 18:06写道:
>> > > > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>> Il giorno ven 22 lug 2022 alle ore 12:05 guo jiwei
>> > > > > > > >>>>> <techno...@apache.org> ha scritto:
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> I will take the release
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>> Thanks !
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>> Enrico
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> Regards
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 12:37 AM Nicolò Boschi <
>> > > > > > > boschi1...@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> I understand the need for the Pulsar Summit.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> In that case I have to step back because I will be
>> > offline
>> > > for
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > >>>>> next few
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> weeks
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Sorry
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Nicolò Boschi
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Il Gio 21 Lug 2022, 06:32 PengHui Li <
>> peng...@apache.org
>> > >
>> > > ha
>> > > > > > > >> scritto:
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for volunteering Nicolò.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> So a plan could be to try to merge the work in
>> progress
>> > > > > targeted
>> > > > > > > >>>>> for
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2.11
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> by the mid of August and then start the code
>> freezing as
>> > > > > described
>> > > > > > > >>>>> in the
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> PIP.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> So the target release date will be early September.
>> One
>> > > point
>> > > > > is
>> > > > > > > >>>>> Pulsar
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Summit
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> San Francisco will start on August 18, 2022. I think
>> > > maybe we
>> > > > > can
>> > > > > > > >>>>> start
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> to
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> test
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the master branch for now and continue the
>> in-progress
>> > > tasks.
>> > > > > If
>> > > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > >>>>> can
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> have a
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> major release before Pulsar Summit, it should be good
>> > > news to
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Community.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Penghui
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:06 PM Enrico Olivelli <
>> > > > > > > >> eolive...@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Nicolò,
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Il Lun 18 Lug 2022, 10:00 Nicolò Boschi <
>> > > > > boschi1...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > ha
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> scritto:
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Penghui for the reminder.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I'd like to also include PIP: 181 Pulsar shell if
>> the
>> > > time
>> > > > > > > >>>>> permits.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I believe that is a good idea to start testing the
>> > code
>> > > > > freeze
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> proposed
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> by
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> PIP-175 (
>> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15966
>> > > ).
>> > > > > Even
>> > > > > > > >>>>> if not
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> officially approved, we discussed it many times and
>> > > agreed
>> > > > > to
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> usefulness of the code freezing.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Great idea!
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We should really try it
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> So a plan could be to try to merge the work in
>> progress
>> > > > > targeted
>> > > > > > > >>>>> for
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2.11
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> by the mid of August and then start the code
>> freezing
>> > as
>> > > > > > > >>>>> described in
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> PIP.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Also, I volunteer for driving the release if nobody
>> > > else is
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> interested
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for volunteering
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Enrico
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Nicolò Boschi
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Il giorno lun 18 lug 2022 alle ore 06:59 Yunze Xu
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> <y...@streamnative.io.invalid> ha scritto:
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> In addition to #16202, there is a following PR to
>> > > support
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> correct
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ACK implementation for chunked messages. It should
>> > > depend
>> > > > > on
>> > > > > > > >>>>> #16202
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> But I think I can submit an initial PR this week
>> and
>> > > > > change the
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> tests
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> after #16202 is merged.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Yunze
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2022年7月18日 11:22,PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org>
>> > 写道:
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> We released 2.10.0 three months ago. And there
>> are
>> > > many
>> > > > > great
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> changes
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> in
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the master branch,
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> including new features and performance
>> improvements.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - PIP 74: apply client memory to consumer
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15216
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - PIP 143: Support split bundles by specified
>> > > boundaries
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/13796
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - PIP 145: regex subscription improvements
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16062
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - PIP 160: transaction performance improvements
>> > > (still in
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> progress
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> and
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> merged some PRs)
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - PIP 161: new exclusive producer mode support
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15488
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - PIP 182: Provide new load balance placement
>> > strategy
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> implementation
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> for
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ModularLoadManagerStrategy
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16281
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Add Pulsar Auth support for the Pulsar SQL
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15571
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> And some features are blocked in the review
>> stage,
>> > but
>> > > > > they
>> > > > > > > >>>>> are
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> powerful
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> improvements for Pulsar
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> PIP 37: Support chunking with Shared subscription
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16202
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> PIP-166: Function add MANUAL delivery semantics
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16279
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find the complete change list in 2.11.0
>> at
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A2.11.0+-label%3Arelease%2F2.10.1+-label%3Arelease%2F2.10.2
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> And maybe I missed some important in-progress
>> PRs,
>> > > please
>> > > > > > > >>>>> let me
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> know
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> if
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> it
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> should be a blocker of the 2.11.0 release.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> It's a good time to discuss the target time of
>> the
>> > > 2.11.0
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> release.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can leave 2 weeks to complete the
>> > > in-progress
>> > > > > PRs
>> > > > > > > >>>>> and
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> 2
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> weeks
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> accept bug fixes.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> And target the 2.11.0 release in mid-August.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know what you think.
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Penghui
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>>>
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to