I see there was some recent activity on https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12944, but I don't know of any other progress.
I won't be able to work on this in the near future, but I'll be happy to help review any PRs related to it. Thanks, Michael On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 8:05 AM Asaf Mesika <asaf.mes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What ended up for this? > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 11:11 AM Alexander Preuss > <alexander.pre...@streamnative.io.invalid> wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > > > Thank you for bringing up this topic. > > I was just running into an issue that prevented me from using the standard > > Pulsar image in Testcontainers and found this discussion. > > > > In my opinion, refactoring the docker builds to allow us to use the ASF > > infra is a great idea. > > I'm also looping in Kay, as she might be able to provide more insights. > > > > Best, > > Alex > > > > On 2022/07/09 07:18:31 Michael Marshall wrote: > > > Hi Pulsar Community, > > > > > > I would like to see the 2.11 docker image ship with support to run on > > > ARM architecture. The issue asking for this feature [0] has had a lot > > > of traction. > > > > > > The Bookkeeper 4.15 upgrade was the last blocker, and since we > > > upgraded to BK 4.15 in May, we should be able to upgrade the docker > > > build to make it a multi-arch build. > > > > > > kezhenxu94 opened a PR [1] to upgrade our build process to include a > > > multi-arch docker image build, but he is unable to finish the PR and > > > has asked for someone else to pick up the work. > > > > > > Before we continue the work, does anyone have strong opinions on how > > > we should update our docker image build? Dave indicated on a separate > > > thread that we should revisit where the docker images are hosted, and > > > Enrico indicated on the PR [2] that we might want to consider > > > automating our docker image build so that the ASF Infra Docker hub bot > > > builds our images. Once we have consensus on these topics, it should > > > be straightforward to update the docker build process for the > > > multi-arch build. > > > > > > In my opinion, we need to support a manual build option to be used by > > > the integration tests (and probably by some users building modified > > > versions of Pulsar). I also think it could be very convenient to have > > > our image built by the ASF bot and hosted in the apache docker hub > > > repo. > > > > > > Let me know what you think. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Michael > > > > > > [0] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12944 > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14005 > > > [2] > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14005#pullrequestreview-913331330 > > > > >
