What ended up for this? On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 11:11 AM Alexander Preuss <alexander.pre...@streamnative.io.invalid> wrote:
> Hi Michael, > > Thank you for bringing up this topic. > I was just running into an issue that prevented me from using the standard > Pulsar image in Testcontainers and found this discussion. > > In my opinion, refactoring the docker builds to allow us to use the ASF > infra is a great idea. > I'm also looping in Kay, as she might be able to provide more insights. > > Best, > Alex > > On 2022/07/09 07:18:31 Michael Marshall wrote: > > Hi Pulsar Community, > > > > I would like to see the 2.11 docker image ship with support to run on > > ARM architecture. The issue asking for this feature [0] has had a lot > > of traction. > > > > The Bookkeeper 4.15 upgrade was the last blocker, and since we > > upgraded to BK 4.15 in May, we should be able to upgrade the docker > > build to make it a multi-arch build. > > > > kezhenxu94 opened a PR [1] to upgrade our build process to include a > > multi-arch docker image build, but he is unable to finish the PR and > > has asked for someone else to pick up the work. > > > > Before we continue the work, does anyone have strong opinions on how > > we should update our docker image build? Dave indicated on a separate > > thread that we should revisit where the docker images are hosted, and > > Enrico indicated on the PR [2] that we might want to consider > > automating our docker image build so that the ASF Infra Docker hub bot > > builds our images. Once we have consensus on these topics, it should > > be straightforward to update the docker build process for the > > multi-arch build. > > > > In my opinion, we need to support a manual build option to be used by > > the integration tests (and probably by some users building modified > > versions of Pulsar). I also think it could be very convenient to have > > our image built by the ASF bot and hosted in the apache docker hub > > repo. > > > > Let me know what you think. > > > > Thanks, > > Michael > > > > [0] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12944 > > [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14005 > > [2] > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14005#pullrequestreview-913331330 > > >
