+1 (binding)

This is a small improvement but a great impact !!

Enrico

Il giorno mar 26 lug 2022 alle ore 12:48 Anon Hxy
<anonhx...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> Hi Zike
>
> Thanks for your reminding.  I just forgot to update the issue and have
> updated it now.  I am not going to add the configuration
> `batchingSingleMessage ` to the producer.
>
> Thanks,
> Xiaoyu Hou
>
> Zike Yang <z...@apache.org> 于2022年7月26日周二 18:16写道:
>
> > Hi, Anon
> >
> > So are you going to add the configuration `batchingSingleMessage ` to
> > the producer? I saw that it was still in the PIP:
> >
> > > So this may cause  ((BatchMessageIdImpl) messageId) throw
> > ClassCastException.  we need to add a switch for the producer to enable or
> > disable this feature
> > > ProducerBuilder<T> batchingSingleMessage(boolean
> > batchingSingleMessage);  // default value is true
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Zike Yang
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 6:05 PM Qiang Huang <qiang.huang1...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1(non-binding)
> > >
> > > BR,
> > > Qiang Huang
> > >
> > > mattison chao <mattisonc...@apache.org> 于2022年7月25日周一 13:17写道:
> > >
> > > > +1(non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Mattison
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 10:35, Haiting Jiang <jianghait...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Haiting
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2022/07/25 02:23:20 Anon Hxy wrote:
> > > > > > Dear Community,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to start a VOTE on "PIP-189: No batching if only one
> > > > message
> > > > > > in batch."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The proposal can be read at [0] and the discussion thread is
> > available
> > > > at
> > > > > > [1] and the PR link is available at [2]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Voting will stay open for at least 48h.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [0] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16619
> > > > > > [1]
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/dbq1lrv03bhtk0lr5nwm5txo9ndjplv0
> > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16605
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Xiaoyu
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > BR,
> > > Qiang Huang
> >

Reply via email to