Hi devs, I learn that PulsarAdminImpl has a static block requires classpath contains exact either of
* slf4j-jdk14 * jul-to-slf4j I'm curious what logging framework Pulsar choose among the codebase. Basically we should depend on either jul facade or slf4j facade, and leave the class loading issue to users who include libraries depending on other logging framework. Current logic causes an issue that if user doesn't depend on both slf4j-jdk14 and jul-to-slf4j, PulsarAdminImpl will panic because it requires exact one of these two deps in the classpath. And thus user should add one of them (basically jul-to-slf4j) even if they don't depend on it effectively. Best, tison.
