Hi all, We have completed the Stale label for the PRs and issues.
So that, we can focus on the active PRs[1] and active issues[2]. Thanks for the great work, yaaln. If you are interested in the PR review and give an answer to the issue, it's a good start to let us focus on the active PRs and issues. [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+-label%3AStale [2] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+-label%3AStale+ Penghui On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 9:18 AM PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> wrote: > > This pr https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14390 can help us. If any > issue or pr had no activity for 30 days, Github action will tag a Stale > label with it. > > Thanks for the great work, I have merged the PR. > > Penghui > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 1:11 AM * yaalsn <yaa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> This pr https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14390 can help us. If any >> issue or pr had no activity for 30 days, Github action will tag a Stale >> label with it. >> >> On 2022/01/12 16:15:16 PengHui Li wrote: >> > Hi Pulsar Community, >> > >> > I want to start a discussion about introducing an icebox label that can >> be >> > added to >> > the issue or PR by pulsar bot automatically to help us can focus on the >> > active PRs >> > and issue. To avoid missing merge PRs, review PRs, triage issues. >> > >> > It looks like the following: >> > >> > 1. If the issue or PR is inactive for more than 4 weeks, the pulsar bot >> add >> > the icebox label >> > 2. If the issue or PR is re-active again, the pulsar bot remove the >> icebox >> > label >> > >> > How to determine the PR or issue is inactive? >> > >> > 1. No comments for 4 weeks. >> > 2. No code review(approve, comment, or change request) for 4 weeks. >> > 3. No commits for 4 weeks. >> > 4. No description update for 4 weeks. >> > >> > How to determine the PR or issue is re-inactive? >> > >> > With the icebox label first and: >> > >> > 1. New comment added >> > 2. New commits pushed >> > 3. Description updated >> > 4. New code review updates >> > >> > Note: all the approved PRs we should not add the icebox label >> > >> > This will help us to focus on the active issues and PRs so that we can >> > track the active issues and PRs better first. After we get this part >> done >> > (maybe keep active opened PR under 20 and active opened issue under >> 50?), >> > we can move forward to continue to handle the stale PRs (already >> discussed >> > in https://lists.apache.org/thread/k7lyw0q0fyc729w0fqlj5vqng5ny63f2). >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Penghui >> > > >
