Hi all,

For https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/13376, I have done some tests to 
verify the upgrade of Pulsar Functions from root image to non-root image.
The test runs on my local machine with KinD cluster, with a fresh Pulsar +auth 
2.8.2 cluster. The cluster uses Kubernetes Runtime and multiple functions been 
created and runs fine.
Then the upgrade uses `helm upgrade` with the self built docker image 
(freeznet/pulsar-all:2.10.0-SNAPSHOT) based on 
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/13376, after the broker and functions 
worker been upgraded, I have used `pulsar-admin functions restart` to trigger 
the function upgradation, and the existing function upgraded to non-root image 
and works fine after restart. I have also tested sinks and sources as well.

So from my tests, the non-root image works fine and #13376 should not block the 
2.10 release.

On 2022/02/09 08:25:00 PengHui Li wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Sorry for the late reply, due to my vacation these days, we got a delay
> here.
> 
> Most of the changes of 2.10.0 are getting merged, for now, there are 14
> opened PRs(10 approved)
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A2.10.0
> 
> I will take care of them and try to get them merged.
> After the above PRs get merged, I will build the release and start the vote.
> Please let me know if you have any questions about the 2.10.0 release.
> And, also looking forward to more people taking a look at the opened PRs.
> 
> Regards,
> Penghui
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:56 AM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > +1.
> >
> > All make sense to me!
> >
> > We probably need to move to the feature frozen stage in order to cut a
> > release at the end of January.
> >
> > - Sijie
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 8:46 PM PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, everyone
> > >
> > > I hope you’ve all been doing well. I would like to start an email thread
> > to
> > > discuss features that we planned for 2.10.0.
> > > According to the time-based release plan
> > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-47%3A-Time-Based-Release-Plan,
> > > we should release 2.10.0 at the end of December 2021, since we have
> > reached
> > > the end of December,
> > > I would like to target the 2.10.0 to the end of January 2022
> > >
> > > There are some powerful features and enhancements in 2.10.0 such as
> > >
> > > - PIP 84: Message redelivery epoch
> > > - PIP 104: Add new consumer type: TableView
> > > - PIP 106: Negative acknowledgment backoff
> > > - PIP 110: Topic customized metadata support
> > > - PIP 117: Change Pulsar standalone defaults
> > > - PIP 118: Do not restart brokers when ZooKeeper session expires
> > > - PIP 119: Enable consistent hashing by default on KeyShared dispatcher
> > > - PIP 120: Enable client memory limit by default
> > > - PIP 121: Pulsar cluster level auto failover
> > > - PIP 123: Pulsar metadata CLI tool
> > > - Metadata service batch operations
> > > - RocksDB metadata service backend
> > > - Etcd metadata service backend
> > > - Ack timeout redelivery backoff policy
> > > - Global topic policies
> > >
> > > Most of them have been completed, some work in progress we need to try to
> > > complete within 2 weeks.
> > > This can give me a 2 week buffer period to prepare for release and
> > complete
> > > the release vote.
> > > For the unfinished parts, we can move them to 2.11.0.
> > >
> > > Some proposals are just being discussed, so I do not list them because
> > I'm
> > > not sure if we can complete them in two weeks.
> > >
> > > You can find all the change lists from
> > >
> > >
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pulls?q=milestone%3A2.10.0+-label%3Arelease%2F2.9.1
> > > There are more than 500 commits.
> > >
> > > If I missed something or you have any suggestions please let me know.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Penghui
> > >
> >
> 

Reply via email to