Hi, @Jason918 <https://github.com/Jason918>
I think we can deprecate maxMessageSize to maxPayloadSize, and add 
maxHeaderSize to limit header size.
after then, we can use maxPayloadSize + maxHeaderSize to get maxMessageSize at 
internal.

What do you think about it?

> On Dec 31, 2021, at 8:05 PM, Haiting Jiang <jianghait...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13591
> 
> Pasted below for quoting convenience.
> 
> ——
> 
> ## Motivation
> 
> Currently, Pulsar client (Java) only checks payload size for max message size 
> validation.
> 
> Client throws TimeoutException if we produce a message with too many 
> properties, see [1].
> But the root cause is that is trigged TooLongFrameException in broker server.
> 
> In this PIP, I propose to include message header size when check 
> maxMessageSize of non-batch
> messages, this brings the following benefits.
> 1. Clients can throw InvalidMessageException immediately if properties takes 
> too much storage space.
> 2. This will make the behaviour consistent with topic level max message size 
> check in broker.
> 3. Strictly limit the entry size less than maxMessageSize, avoid sending 
> message to bookkeeper failed.
> 
> ## Goal
> 
> Include message header size when check maxMessageSize for non-batch message 
> on the client side.
> 
> ## Implementation
> 
> ```
> // Add a size check in 
> org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.ProducerImpl#processOpSendMsg
> if (op.msg != null // for non-batch messages only
>    && op.getMessageHeaderAndPayloadSize() > ClientCnx.getMaxMessageSize()) {
>    // finish send op with InvalidMessageException
>    releaseSemaphoreForSendOp(op);
>    op.sendComplete(new PulsarClientException(new InvalidMessageException, 
> op.sequenceId));
> }
> 
> 
> // 
> org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.ProducerImpl.OpSendMsg#getMessageHeaderAndPayloadSize
> 
> public int getMessageHeaderAndPayloadSize() {
>    ByteBuf cmdHeader = cmd.getFirst();
>    cmdHeader.markReaderIndex();
>    int totalSize = cmdHeader.readInt();
>    int cmdSize = cmdHeader.readInt();
>    int msgHeadersAndPayloadSize = totalSize - cmdSize - 4;
>    cmdHeader.resetReaderIndex();
>    return msgHeadersAndPayloadSize;
> }
> ```
> 
> ## Reject Alternatives
> Add a new property like "maxPropertiesSize" or "maxHeaderSize" in broker.conf 
> and pass it to 
> client like maxMessageSize. But the implementation is much more complex, and 
> don't have the 
> benefit 2 and 3 mentioned in Motivation.
> 
> ## Compatibility Issue
> As a matter of fact, this PIP narrows down the sendable range. Previously, 
> when maxMessageSize
> is 1KB, it's ok to send message with 1KB properties and 1KB payload. But with 
> this PIP, the 
> sending will fail with InvalidMessageException.
> 
> One conservative way is to add a boolean config "includeHeaderInSizeCheck" to 
> enable this 
> feature. But I think it's OK to enable this directly as it's more reasonable, 
> and I don't see good 
> migration plan if we add a config for this.
> 
> The compatibility issue is worth discussing. And any suggestions are 
> appreciated.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13560
> 
> Thanks,
> Haiting Jiang

Reply via email to