Aha. Get it.

+1

Best,
tison.


Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午4:29写道:

> Tison,
> actually we already implemented it :-)
>
> I believe this thread is only for having a formal process and record the
> work as a  PIP
>
>
> +1
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno gio 4 nov 2021 alle ore 07:46 tison <wander4...@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
>> Yes I read it. It describes a lot of details which I can conclude is that
>> "We need a bot".
>>
>> But we already have a bot running online
>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml.
>> So it confuses me.
>>
>> Best,
>> tison.
>>
>>
>> Anonymitaet _ <anonymita...@hotmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午2:41写道:
>>
>>> Hi Tison, have you ever read through this proposal (
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit)?
>>> It documents  problems solved by the Bot and our implementation details.
>>>
>>> From: tison <wander4...@gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: "us...@pulsar.apache.org" <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
>>> Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 14:30
>>> To: pulsar-users <us...@pulsar.apache.org>
>>> Cc: Dev <dev@pulsar.apache.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of
>>> Developing Docs
>>>
>>> Isn't
>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml
>>> already into use?
>>>
>>> From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> tison.
>>>
>>>
>>> PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org<mailto:peng...@apache.org>>
>>> 于2021年11月4日周四 上午8:05写道:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Penghui
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <anonymita...@hotmail.com
>>> <mailto:anonymita...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Hi Pulsar Community,
>>>
>>> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109).
>>>
>>> The issue for this PIP 109 is here
>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595.
>>> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and
>>> all details about Doc Bot.
>>>
>>> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks!
>>>
>>> Anonymitaet
>>>
>>

Reply via email to