Yes I read it. It describes a lot of details which I can conclude is that "We need a bot".
But we already have a bot running online https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml. So it confuses me. Best, tison. Anonymitaet _ <anonymita...@hotmail.com> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午2:41写道： > Hi Tison, have you ever read through this proposal ( > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit)? > It documents problems solved by the Bot and our implementation details. > > From: tison <wander4...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: "us...@pulsar.apache.org" <us...@pulsar.apache.org> > Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 14:30 > To: pulsar-users <us...@pulsar.apache.org> > Cc: Dev <dev@pulsar.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of > Developing Docs > > Isn't > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml > already into use? > > From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve. > > Best, > tison. > > > PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org<mailto:peng...@apache.org>> 于2021年11月4日周四 > 上午8:05写道： > +1 > > Penghui > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <anonymita...@hotmail.com > <mailto:anonymita...@hotmail.com>> wrote: > Hi Pulsar Community, > > I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109). > > The issue for this PIP 109 is here > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595. > It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and > all details about Doc Bot. > > Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks! > > Anonymitaet >
