+1 BR//Huanli
> On Mar 15, 2021, at 10:08 AM, Guangning E <eguangn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > Jia Zhai <zhai...@apache.org> 于2021年3月15日周一 上午10:03写道： > >> +1 >> It is clear. and this would make the management of Pulsar repo more easy. >> >> Regards. >> >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:29 PM Joshua Odmark <j...@pandio.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 I think this is a great idea. >>> >>> I like that it simplifies things by making it easier to understand. >>> >>> I think it will increase credibility as well. Surprisingly, many people >>> don’t realize presto/trino is behind the scenes. Making that more well >> know >>> will only help. It’s an additional community we can engage as well to >> help >>> increase awareness for Pulsar. >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:33 AM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I had a conversation with Jerry and Matteo about NOT including >>> presto/trino >>>> in the normal Pulsar distribution. >>>> >>>> Here is the summary of the discussion: >>>> >>>> - Move the presto connector to pulsar-presto repo as part of PIP-62 >>>> - In the main pulsar repo, we don't bundle presto in the pulsar >>>> distribution >>>> - In pulsar-presto repo, we ship it as a standalone connector that can >> be >>>> installed in an existing trinodb cluster. We can also ship a >>> pulsar-presto >>>> image or distribution which includes trinodb. So people can still >> easily >>>> test it. >>>> - Update the documentation: People can use pulsar-presto image or >>>> distribution to test presto connector easily; for production >> deployment, >>> we >>>> focus on documenting how to deploy the connector to an existing trinode >>>> cluster. >>>> >>>> Let me know what do you think. If there is no objection, I will move >>>> forward with this plan. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Sijie >>>> >>> >>
