+1 It is clear. and this would make the management of Pulsar repo more easy.
Regards. On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:29 PM Joshua Odmark <j...@pandio.com> wrote: > +1 I think this is a great idea. > > I like that it simplifies things by making it easier to understand. > > I think it will increase credibility as well. Surprisingly, many people > don’t realize presto/trino is behind the scenes. Making that more well know > will only help. It’s an additional community we can engage as well to help > increase awareness for Pulsar. > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:33 AM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I had a conversation with Jerry and Matteo about NOT including > presto/trino > > in the normal Pulsar distribution. > > > > Here is the summary of the discussion: > > > > - Move the presto connector to pulsar-presto repo as part of PIP-62 > > - In the main pulsar repo, we don't bundle presto in the pulsar > > distribution > > - In pulsar-presto repo, we ship it as a standalone connector that can be > > installed in an existing trinodb cluster. We can also ship a > pulsar-presto > > image or distribution which includes trinodb. So people can still easily > > test it. > > - Update the documentation: People can use pulsar-presto image or > > distribution to test presto connector easily; for production deployment, > we > > focus on documenting how to deploy the connector to an existing trinode > > cluster. > > > > Let me know what do you think. If there is no objection, I will move > > forward with this plan. > > > > Thanks, > > Sijie > > >
