On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 4:39 PM sun yao <foreversun...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi PengHui, > Could it be considered as a feature > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/3915 , thanks > Hi Yao, I think this is already marked as a feature. - Sijie > > On Friday, May 17, 2019, 4:43:50 PM GMT+8, PengHui Li < > codelipeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all > > It is about 3 months since last major release (2.3.0). I am planning to > start the 2.4.0 release soon (probably next week). > > > I would like to check the current status for the in-progress features, to > see what need to be merged and included in 2.4.0. > > > Here is the list of items still in progress. Can the owner confirm if we > should include them in 2.4.0? Also if they are not started or need more > time to complete, can we push some of them to next release? > > > *in-process features :* > > 1. Delayed message delivery > 2. Key value schema compatibility checker > 3. Rate limiter for replicator > 4. Snappy compression for java client > 5. Tenant based bookie isolation > 6. Secondary bookie isolation group > 7. Reader for pulsar-spout in pulsar-storm > 8. Support key value schema versioning > 9. Pulsar IO Source Connector for Couchbase > <https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/4210> > > *issues plan to fix in 2.4.0:* > > 1. Update debezium connector documentation > 2. Pulsar SQL is not able to read the latest message > > Please let me know if I miss anything. > > Thanks. > Penghui > > > Ezequiel Lovelle <ezequiellove...@gmail.com> 于2019年4月24日周三 上午4:28写道： > > > Sorry for my confusion, I thought the intention was listing both, wip and > > done features. > > > > > Let's bring the discussion back to the list of features to be included > in > > 2.4.0 > > > > Do we want to include #4062 <https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/4062> > > in > > 2.4.0? I'm very interested in this one. > > > > Congrats PengHui :) > > -- > > *Ezequiel Lovelle* > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 15:00, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 1:51 AM Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I don't think the original email was trying to list all the > features. > > > It > > > > > was trying to bring up all the *in-progress* features > > > > > to discuss > > > > > > > > I don't really want to drag the conversation but I think it difficult > > > > to characterize the unilaterally declaration of a "feature freeze > > > > immediate now" for a call for discussion. > > > > > > > > > > Since I am mentoring Penghui for the release, I take the responsibility > > for > > > this and > > > apologize for any misleading words he was using in this email. > > > > > > Let's bring the discussion back to the list of features to be included > in > > > 2.4.0, and help > > > him successfully cut a release. > > > > > > - Sijie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:30 AM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Lovelle, > > > > > > > > > > I don't think the original email was trying to list all the > features. > > > It > > > > > was trying to bring up all the *in-progress* features > > > > > to discuss, so that the community can wrap up the tasks for the > > release > > > > > manager to release 2.4.0. If an in-progress > > > > > feature that is not needed for 2.4.0, people can comment to remove > it > > > > from > > > > > the list; if a new feature is not showed > > > > > up in the in-progress, people can comment to bring it up. (I don't > > mean > > > > to > > > > > jump in to claim a process here. but I am > > > > > here to help a new release manager to get familiar with a release > > > process > > > > > based on my experiences with pulsar and > > > > > other ASF projects) > > > > > > > > > > So I guess that's why negative acks is omitted from that list, > since > > it > > > > is > > > > > already merged in 2.4.0. At the point when > > > > > the email was sent, interceptors are not merged. Hope this can > clean > > up > > > > the > > > > > confusion. > > > > > > > > > > I hope this email thread should be brought back to focus on what > > > > > in-progress features should be included in 2.4.0 and > > > > > what should be pushed to 2.5.0, and if there are features that > > people > > > is > > > > > already working on but not shown in the issues list. > > > > > So that the release manager can know when to start cutting the > > release. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Sijie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 9:29 PM Ezequiel Lovelle < > > > > ezequiellove...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > > > My 2 cents, as Matteo said, the feature which is worth mentioning > > is > > > > > > negative ack instead of its interceptor. > > > > > > > > > > > > Idk If it's as a relevant feature, but in pull #4031 > > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/4031> we've just finish > > > > > > adding support for seek() in Reader impl. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > *Ezequiel Lovelle* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 02:24, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is the time for the community to discuss. Since 2.4 has > > already > > > > > > > accumulated 1+ month changes, we should be ready to cut a > release > > > > soon. > > > > > > So > > > > > > > ideally we should just wrap the in progress changes and release > > > > 2.4.0. If > > > > > > > the features are not started yet, we can push those features to > > > > 2.5.0. > > > > > > That > > > > > > > what we have been doing in the past releases - We are trying to > > do > > > > > > releases > > > > > > > in 1~2 months or so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unless there are strong requirements that a unstarted feature > is > > > > needed > > > > > > to > > > > > > > be included. We can bring it for discussion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sijie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:06 PM Jerry Peng < > > > > jerry.boyang.p...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are we collecting a list of still in-progress features for > 2.4 > > or > > > > are > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > collecting a list of all the features going into 2.4? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 9:36 PM Sijie Guo < > guosi...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think Penghui was just trying to collect a list of > features > > > to > > > > be > > > > > > > > > included in 2.4.0 and have a discussion thread to include > any > > > > missed > > > > > > > > items. > > > > > > > > > So that he can have a better estimation on when to cut the > > > 2.4.0 > > > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > “Feature Freeze” is probably not the right word here, but > it > > > is a > > > > > > > common > > > > > > > > > concept in a software release cycle. We can discuss what > > would > > > > be the > > > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > > term in a separated thread. Let’s focus on giving him the > > list > > > of > > > > > > > > features > > > > > > > > > to be included for 2.4.0. So he can know what to wait for. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Sijie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:34 AM Jerry Peng < > > > > > > > jerry.boyang.p...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yup the PMC usually need to vote on something like this > and > > > be > > > > in > > > > > > > > > agreement > > > > > > > > > > before such a freeze can take into effect. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Jerry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 8:24 PM Matteo Merli < > > > > > > matteo.me...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Negative acks also would be a new feature of 2.4, not > > just > > > > its > > > > > > > > exposure > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > interceptors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 8:07 PM Matteo Merli < > > > > > > > matteo.me...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NodeJS client was meant for 2.4 as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 8:06 PM Matteo Merli < > > > > > > > > matteo.me...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Replicated subscriptions are meant for 2.4 > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 7:58 PM PengHui Li < > > > > > > > > codelipeng...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> There are already a lot of great features in 2.4.0. > > It > > > is > > > > > > time > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > > > >>> 2.4.0 now. I am calling a feature freeze for 2.4.0. > > We > > > > are > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > going > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > >>> accept any new features from now. People still have > > > time > > > > to > > > > > > > > > complete > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > >>> ongoing features and any bug fixes. The code change > > > will > > > > be > > > > > > > > freeze > > > > > > > > > > in 2 > > > > > > > > > > > >>> weeks. > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> I am listing the in-progress features as below. > > Please > > > > let me > > > > > > > > know > > > > > > > > > > if I > > > > > > > > > > > >>> miss anything. > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - Go Function > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - Go Schema > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - Key_Shared Subscription > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - Delayed Message > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - Kerberos Support > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - Multi-Hosts service url support in pulsar admin > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - Multi-version Schema support > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - Interceptor for negative ack send > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - Pulsar IO connector for InfluxDB sink > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> - Penghui > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > > > > > > >> Matteo Merli > > > > > > > > > > > >> <matteo.me...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Matteo Merli > > > > > > > > > > > > <matteo.me...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > Matteo Merli > > > > > > > > > > > <matteo.me...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
