Hi!

My 2 cents, as Matteo said, the feature which is worth mentioning is
negative ack instead of its interceptor.

Idk If it's as a relevant feature, but in pull #4031
<https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/4031> we've just finish
adding support for seek() in Reader impl.

--
*Ezequiel Lovelle*


On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 02:24, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It is the time for the community to discuss. Since 2.4 has already
> accumulated 1+ month changes, we should be ready to cut a release soon. So
> ideally we should just wrap the in progress changes and release 2.4.0. If
> the features are not started yet, we can push those features to 2.5.0. That
> what we have been doing in the past releases - We are trying to do releases
> in 1~2 months or so.
>
> Unless there are strong requirements that a unstarted feature is needed to
> be included. We can bring it for discussion.
>
> Sijie
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:06 PM Jerry Peng <jerry.boyang.p...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Are we collecting a list of still in-progress features for 2.4 or are we
> > collecting a list of all the features going into 2.4?
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 9:36 PM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I think Penghui was just trying to collect a list of features to be
> > > included in 2.4.0 and have a discussion thread to include any missed
> > items.
> > > So that he can have a better estimation on when to cut the 2.4.0
> release.
> > > “Feature Freeze” is probably not the right word here, but it is a
> common
> > > concept in a software release cycle. We can discuss what would be the
> > right
> > > term in a separated thread. Let’s focus on giving him the list of
> > features
> > > to be included for 2.4.0. So he can know what to wait for.
> > >
> > > - Sijie
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:34 AM Jerry Peng <
> jerry.boyang.p...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yup the PMC usually need to vote on something like this and be in
> > > agreement
> > > > before such a freeze can take into effect.
> > > >
> > > > -Jerry
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 8:24 PM Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Negative acks also would be a new feature of 2.4, not just its
> > exposure
> > > > in
> > > > > interceptors.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 8:07 PM Matteo Merli <
> matteo.me...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > NodeJS client was meant for 2.4 as well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 8:06 PM Matteo Merli <
> > matteo.me...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Replicated subscriptions are meant for 2.4
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 7:58 PM PengHui Li <
> > codelipeng...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Hi all,
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> There are already a lot of great features in 2.4.0. It is time
> to
> > > > > release
> > > > > >>> 2.4.0 now. I am calling a feature freeze for 2.4.0. We are not
> > > going
> > > > to
> > > > > >>> accept any new features from now. People still have time to
> > > complete
> > > > > the
> > > > > >>> ongoing features and any bug fixes. The code change will be
> > freeze
> > > > in 2
> > > > > >>> weeks.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> I am listing the in-progress features as below. Please let me
> > know
> > > > if I
> > > > > >>> miss anything.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> - Go Function
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> - Go Schema
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> - Key_Shared Subscription
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> - Delayed Message
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> - Kerberos Support
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> - Multi-Hosts service url support in pulsar admin
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> - Multi-version Schema support
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> - Interceptor for negative ack send
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> - Pulsar IO connector for InfluxDB sink
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> - Penghui
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> Matteo Merli
> > > > > >> <matteo.me...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matteo Merli
> > > > > > <matteo.me...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matteo Merli
> > > > > <matteo.me...@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to