Hi Alex, No worries at all. I understand it is not your intent to merge them, but the current doc index page already presents the release information. In particular, the page (https://polaris.apache.org/docs/) currently lists active and End of Life releases, even though the EOF discussion was only sent out today. Because of this, it might make more sense to move that release status information to the release page (https://polaris.apache.org/downloads/). After doing so, all release related information would remain with the release pages, and there would be less need to rename the section back to "Downloads".
Yufei On Tue, Mar 3, 2026 at 4:17 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > It makes sense to me to have downloads. Afair it’s what we had in the past > (in the early versions of the website). I don’t remember why we changed. > I agree with your arguments. > > Regards > JB > > Le lun. 2 mars 2026 à 08:22, Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Hi all, > > > > While working on some improvements to the web site [1], I briefly > > suggested renaming the current "Releases" section to "Downloads" in > > order to better reflect the contents of the section. > > > > Today I realized that the section was called "Downloads" before (!) > > and was renamed "Releases" back in November [2]. > > > > But the reasons for the renaming are not clear. > > > > My arguments for reverting to "Downloads" are: > > > > - It perfectly describes the content of the section. > > > > - We have two sections that organize content by releases: > > "Documentation" and the current "Releases" (ex-Downloads) section; > > IOW, both have an equal claim to be called "Releases", which is why > > none of them should take that title. > > > > Wdyt? > > > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/3902 > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2928 > > >
