Hi Yufei, I do not mind starting a separate VOTE thread on this spec change.
However, in Polaris I do not think that we _usually_ do that, IIRC. Do you have examples from the past? My recollection is that the usual practice is to have a discussion thread on `dev` (like this one) and approve in GH. I do not mind changing it, though, if the community agrees. Cheers, Dmitri. On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 12:43 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for working on it. We usually vote on spec changes. Can we open a > vote for this? > > Yufei > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 9:28 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > After a few review rounds, PR [3729] appears to be ready to merge. > > > > Since this is a major feature, I propose waiting a bit longer (late > > reviewers please take this as a gentle reminder) and merging on Mar 2. > > > > [3729] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/3729 > > > > Cheers, > > Dmitri. > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 6:12 AM Phillip Henry <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > I've added a REST API class (GcpAuthenticationParameters) in an attempt > > to > > > address #3451 <https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/3451> - that > is, > > > allowing users to create external catalogs that use the > GoogleAuthManager > > > in the Iceberg codebase. > > > > > > I've put together this pull request > > > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/3729> that hopefully > implements > > > this. Other than adding an extra enum element to > > AuthenticationParameters, > > > there are no changes to existing classes. > > > > > > Dmitri Bourlatchkov has told me this necessitates a discussion in the > > > mailing lists and asked me to kick one off. So can I please ask for > > > opinions? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Phillip > > > > > >
