Hi Kenneth, Slightly off topic to this thread, but you might be interested in the "evolution" PR [1] and the related dev email [2] from the "user side". Any feedback is welcome.
[1] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1890 [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/c0sk6hmtz9l4vs0mjc21wvlpblqhgx7r Thanks, Dmitri. On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 10:58 AM Kenneth Kang <colorgraphpa...@mailbox.org.invalid> wrote: > My team has been tracking the 0.9 and 0.10 branches. They haven't > diverged too much from their branching points off main. I am good with > pruning the branches to focus usage to current versions. > > Kenneth > > On 6/16/25 07:57, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: > > Dropping the 0.9 release branch, and keeping the tag (of course) SGTM. > > > > Cheers, > > Dmitri. > > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 10:54 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > > wrote: > > > >> That's a good point. > >> > >> Rethinking about that, if we keep the tag, I think we are good to > >> remove release/0.9.x branch (and the "old" 0.9 rc tags). > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 3:57 PM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> wrote: > >>> I've deleted all branches except the 0.9 one. > >>> > >>> Do we really maintain 0.9? It's quite old and we said it's a > source-only > >>> release. > >>> > >>> On 13.06.25 14:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> I agree to delete release/0.10 branch (as it's not used anymore). > >>>> > >>>> However, I would keep release/0.9 for now as we did a release on this > >>>> branch, so we could have a request from the community to do a new > >>>> release (0.9.1, etc), even if I don't think it will happen :) > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> JB > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 1:56 PM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> wrote: > >>>>> Deleting the release/0.9+10 branches is fine for me. > >>>>> > >>>>> Any objections to delete those? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 13.06.25 03:35, Michael Collado wrote: > >>>>>> I have no objections. Any of my old branches are there purely > >> accidentally. > >>>>>> Mike > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 1:48 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>> +1, I'm all for keeping the code base and repo clean. Deleted > >>>>>>> branch yufei-test-1.0.x and 1.0.x. I think we can also delete > >>>>>>> branch "release/0.10.x" as the 0.10 release was cancelled. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yufei > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 8:30 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > >> j...@nanthrax.net> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I deleted my "old" branches. Sorry about that. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Agree to keep the "branches clean". > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>>> JB > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 10:26 AM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Hi guys, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I noticed that there are a bunch of stale branches and branches > >> that > >>>>>>>>> look like experiments in the Polaris GitHub repository > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/ (see below). > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Generally, I think only the technically necessary branches should > >> be in > >>>>>>>>> the Polaris GH repo. Those are: main, asf-site, versioned-docs > and > >>>>>>>>> release/*. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Another aspect why we should refrain from prematurely creating > >> branches > >>>>>>>>> in the https://github.com/apache/polaris/ repo is that workflows > >> in > >>>>>>>>> these branches can gain access to secrets, which is a concern at > >> least > >>>>>>>>> for me. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I'd go ahead and delete the branches mentioned below beginning of > >> next > >>>>>>>>> week, if nobody objects. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thoughts? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Robert > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> commit 1b0c0499a4c68e08138b43e151eb41a89b6f53e0 > >>>>>>>>> (github/configuring-polaris-for-production) > >>>>>>>>> Author: annafil <7892219+anna...@users.noreply.github.com> > >>>>>>>>> AuthorDate: Thu Aug 1 09:23:18 2024 -0700 > >>>>>>>>> Commit: annafil <7892219+anna...@users.noreply.github.com> > >>>>>>>>> CommitDate: Thu Aug 1 09:23:18 2024 -0700 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> ensure new links are rendered in web > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> commit 48d220fab6441a15e4d681b73a093e9b8ada3620 > >> (github/jbonofre-11) > >>>>>>>>> Author: JB Onofré <jbono...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>> AuthorDate: Wed Jul 31 16:12:03 2024 +0200 > >>>>>>>>> Commit: JB Onofré <jbono...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>> CommitDate: Wed Jul 31 16:12:03 2024 +0200 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Force user.language as some tests are locale dependent > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> commit fe0ef3d50f9f133ca1998ab8bba33ca407be75f1 > >> (github/jbonofre-asf) > >>>>>>>>> Author: JB Onofré <jbono...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>> AuthorDate: Wed Aug 21 19:16:28 2024 +0200 > >>>>>>>>> Commit: JB Onofré <jbono...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>> CommitDate: Wed Aug 21 19:16:28 2024 +0200 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Add DISCLAIMER_WIP > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> commit 92797e485cfe509854085708b443b3c6a1107a31 > >>>>>>>>> (github/mcollado-authn-resolve-roles) > >>>>>>>>> Author: Michael Collado <michael.coll...@snowflake.com> > >>>>>>>>> AuthorDate: Fri Jan 10 17:05:45 2025 -0800 > >>>>>>>>> Commit: Michael Collado <michael.coll...@snowflake.com> > >>>>>>>>> CommitDate: Fri Jan 10 17:08:28 2025 -0800 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Removed injected security context > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> commit 1a6b3eb3963355f78c5ca916cc1d66ecd1493092 > >> (github/public-release) > >>>>>>>>> Author: Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> > >>>>>>>>> AuthorDate: Tue Jul 30 13:38:08 2024 +0200 > >>>>>>>>> Commit: Michael Collado <michael.coll...@snowflake.com> > >>>>>>>>> CommitDate: Tue Jul 30 07:30:21 2024 -0700 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Spotless, license header, add xml (#25) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> commit 3ea8db436ad08ab5053ad44c3d0127dccd1cae0d > >>>>>>>>> (github/revert-806-bootstrap-only-root) > >>>>>>>>> Author: Eric Maynard <emayn...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>> AuthorDate: Wed Jan 22 10:00:23 2025 -0800 > >>>>>>>>> Commit: GitHub <nore...@github.com> > >>>>>>>>> CommitDate: Wed Jan 22 10:00:23 2025 -0800 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Revert "Simplify credentials format when bootstrapping > >> (#806)" > >>>>>>>>> This reverts commit > >> 4eee4fe00eb834655f24c57d697764984f3f4731. > >>>>>>>>> commit f393a1dd4d1ff6416e37255f60ada9ac51ece13b > >>>>>>> (github/yufei-test-1.0.x) > >>>>>>>>> Author: Prashant Singh < > >>>>>>> 35593236+singhpk...@users.noreply.github.com > >>>>>>>>> AuthorDate: Fri Jun 6 11:26:48 2025 -0700 > >>>>>>>>> Commit: GitHub <nore...@github.com> > >>>>>>>>> CommitDate: Fri Jun 6 11:26:48 2025 -0700 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> JDBC: Use PreparedStatement (#1802) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> Robert Stupp > >>>>>>>>> @snazy > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Robert Stupp > >>>>> @snazy > >>>>> >
