Dropping the 0.9 release branch, and keeping the tag (of course) SGTM. Cheers, Dmitri.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 10:54 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > That's a good point. > > Rethinking about that, if we keep the tag, I think we are good to > remove release/0.9.x branch (and the "old" 0.9 rc tags). > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 3:57 PM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> wrote: > > > > I've deleted all branches except the 0.9 one. > > > > Do we really maintain 0.9? It's quite old and we said it's a source-only > > release. > > > > On 13.06.25 14:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > I agree to delete release/0.10 branch (as it's not used anymore). > > > > > > However, I would keep release/0.9 for now as we did a release on this > > > branch, so we could have a request from the community to do a new > > > release (0.9.1, etc), even if I don't think it will happen :) > > > > > > Regards > > > JB > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 1:56 PM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> wrote: > > >> Deleting the release/0.9+10 branches is fine for me. > > >> > > >> Any objections to delete those? > > >> > > >> > > >> On 13.06.25 03:35, Michael Collado wrote: > > >>> I have no objections. Any of my old branches are there purely > accidentally. > > >>> > > >>> Mike > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 1:48 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1, I'm all for keeping the code base and repo clean. Deleted > > >>>> branch yufei-test-1.0.x and 1.0.x. I think we can also delete > > >>>> branch "release/0.10.x" as the 0.10 release was cancelled. > > >>>> > > >>>> Yufei > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 8:30 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Hi > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I deleted my "old" branches. Sorry about that. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Agree to keep the "branches clean". > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Regards > > >>>>> JB > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 10:26 AM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> > wrote: > > >>>>>> Hi guys, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I noticed that there are a bunch of stale branches and branches > that > > >>>>>> look like experiments in the Polaris GitHub repository > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/ (see below). > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Generally, I think only the technically necessary branches should > be in > > >>>>>> the Polaris GH repo. Those are: main, asf-site, versioned-docs and > > >>>>>> release/*. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Another aspect why we should refrain from prematurely creating > branches > > >>>>>> in the https://github.com/apache/polaris/ repo is that workflows > in > > >>>>>> these branches can gain access to secrets, which is a concern at > least > > >>>>>> for me. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I'd go ahead and delete the branches mentioned below beginning of > next > > >>>>>> week, if nobody objects. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thoughts? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Robert > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> commit 1b0c0499a4c68e08138b43e151eb41a89b6f53e0 > > >>>>>> (github/configuring-polaris-for-production) > > >>>>>> Author: annafil <7892219+anna...@users.noreply.github.com> > > >>>>>> AuthorDate: Thu Aug 1 09:23:18 2024 -0700 > > >>>>>> Commit: annafil <7892219+anna...@users.noreply.github.com> > > >>>>>> CommitDate: Thu Aug 1 09:23:18 2024 -0700 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> ensure new links are rendered in web > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> commit 48d220fab6441a15e4d681b73a093e9b8ada3620 > (github/jbonofre-11) > > >>>>>> Author: JB Onofré <jbono...@apache.org> > > >>>>>> AuthorDate: Wed Jul 31 16:12:03 2024 +0200 > > >>>>>> Commit: JB Onofré <jbono...@apache.org> > > >>>>>> CommitDate: Wed Jul 31 16:12:03 2024 +0200 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Force user.language as some tests are locale dependent > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> commit fe0ef3d50f9f133ca1998ab8bba33ca407be75f1 > (github/jbonofre-asf) > > >>>>>> Author: JB Onofré <jbono...@apache.org> > > >>>>>> AuthorDate: Wed Aug 21 19:16:28 2024 +0200 > > >>>>>> Commit: JB Onofré <jbono...@apache.org> > > >>>>>> CommitDate: Wed Aug 21 19:16:28 2024 +0200 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Add DISCLAIMER_WIP > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> commit 92797e485cfe509854085708b443b3c6a1107a31 > > >>>>>> (github/mcollado-authn-resolve-roles) > > >>>>>> Author: Michael Collado <michael.coll...@snowflake.com> > > >>>>>> AuthorDate: Fri Jan 10 17:05:45 2025 -0800 > > >>>>>> Commit: Michael Collado <michael.coll...@snowflake.com> > > >>>>>> CommitDate: Fri Jan 10 17:08:28 2025 -0800 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Removed injected security context > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> commit 1a6b3eb3963355f78c5ca916cc1d66ecd1493092 > (github/public-release) > > >>>>>> Author: Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de> > > >>>>>> AuthorDate: Tue Jul 30 13:38:08 2024 +0200 > > >>>>>> Commit: Michael Collado <michael.coll...@snowflake.com> > > >>>>>> CommitDate: Tue Jul 30 07:30:21 2024 -0700 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Spotless, license header, add xml (#25) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> commit 3ea8db436ad08ab5053ad44c3d0127dccd1cae0d > > >>>>>> (github/revert-806-bootstrap-only-root) > > >>>>>> Author: Eric Maynard <emayn...@apache.org> > > >>>>>> AuthorDate: Wed Jan 22 10:00:23 2025 -0800 > > >>>>>> Commit: GitHub <nore...@github.com> > > >>>>>> CommitDate: Wed Jan 22 10:00:23 2025 -0800 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Revert "Simplify credentials format when bootstrapping > (#806)" > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> This reverts commit > 4eee4fe00eb834655f24c57d697764984f3f4731. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> commit f393a1dd4d1ff6416e37255f60ada9ac51ece13b > > >>>> (github/yufei-test-1.0.x) > > >>>>>> Author: Prashant Singh < > > >>>> 35593236+singhpk...@users.noreply.github.com > > >>>>>> AuthorDate: Fri Jun 6 11:26:48 2025 -0700 > > >>>>>> Commit: GitHub <nore...@github.com> > > >>>>>> CommitDate: Fri Jun 6 11:26:48 2025 -0700 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> JDBC: Use PreparedStatement (#1802) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Robert Stupp > > >>>>>> @snazy > > >>>>>> > > >> -- > > >> Robert Stupp > > >> @snazy > > >> >
