Hi JB, That's a very good idea.
Regarding Docker images, I think it would be great if users could just "docker pull apache/polaris" and start using Polaris, as opposed to having to manually build the images. However, a Docker image with just in-memory persistence is likely useless for anything else than prototyping. I raised the question a while ago about how we would handle official images with support for data sources. I don't think we decided on that yet. I am fine with the idea of publishing just in-memory images for now, but once the work on persistence is done, we'd need to have a more professional stance on image publishing. Then there is the question of the Helm chart. I think it is important to publish Helm charts as well. Do you want me to drive that part of the process? It could be done as part of 0.10.0, or for the next binary release if the timeline is too tight. Thanks, Alex On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 9:22 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it's a good idea. Thanks JB. > > If it's only for testing binary distributions. Can we base it on 0.9.0 so > that we can give users a clear message that everything else is the same as > 0.9.0 except it provides binary distribution? > This is mainly to make life easier for OSS users as well as developers. > 1. In case of bug fix on 0.9.0, we can directly do it in 0.10.1. The > community doesn't have to maintain two branches for bug fix. > 2. Users don't have to choose between 0.9.0 and 0.10.0, as they are the > same. If they need binary distribution, they just go with 0.10.0. > Otherwise, either one is fine. > > Yufei > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 1:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > > Hi Dmitri > > > > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/polaris > > > > It's empty for now :) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 8:56 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > As we have a Polaris repo on Docker HUB [...] > > > > > > What do we currently push there? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 3:47 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > The binary distributions are everything we distribute/publish. I > would > > > > focus on archive (tar.gz/zip), and jar files. > > > > As we have a Polaris repo on Docker HUB, I will also include docker > > image > > > > check. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > JB > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 1:53 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < > di...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I think it's a good idea. Thanks for taking care of this, JB! > > > > > > > > > > What is included in the binary distribution? Just jars or docker > too? > > > > > > > > > > Side note: we should probably adjust PR #1070 [1] since the first > > release > > > > > number is going to be different. > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1170 > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 5:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > j...@nanthrax.net> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > > > > > We are working on the 1.0.0 release, with a lot of new features > and > > > > fixes. > > > > > > > > > > > > One important change between 0.9.0 and 1.0.0 is the publication > of > > the > > > > > > binary distributions, with all related requirements > > (LICENSE/NOTICE, > > > > > > etc). > > > > > > I'm working on the LICENSE/NOTICE and binary distributions > > publication. > > > > > > Considering the time we needed to complete the 0.9.0 release, I > > think > > > > > > it would be great to "anticipate" a little before 1.0.0. It would > > > > > > allow us to "accelerate" on the 1.0.0 release and beyond. > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to propose the 0.10.0 release, as an "intermediate" > > > > > > release. I would like to prepare this release by the end of next > > week, > > > > > > creating the 0.10.x branch (based on the main branch) on > Saturday, > > > > > > March 22 and cutting the 0.10.0 release on Monday, March 24. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > > > >
