Thanks for the explanation, JB! In that case, we may focus on 0.10.0 only.
How about a name like pre-1.0, which clarifies that it's a release mainly
to test out something for 1.0.0?

Yufei


On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 11:33 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> Hi Yufei
>
> That's a good point.
>
> What about doing both ?
> - 0.9.1 would be the same as 0.9.0 but with binary distributions
> - 0.10.0 would be based on main
>
> The reason I would like to do that is because the binary distributions
> are not the same (the framework used is not the same).
> In order to "prepare" 1.0.0, 0.10.0 would be welcome (binary
> distributions will be "close" between 0.10.0 and 1.0.0).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 9:21 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think it's a good idea. Thanks JB.
> >
> > If it's only for testing binary distributions. Can we base it on 0.9.0 so
> > that we can give users a clear message that everything else is the same
> as
> > 0.9.0 except it provides binary distribution?
> > This is mainly to make life easier for OSS users as well as developers.
> > 1. In case of bug fix on 0.9.0, we can directly do it in 0.10.1. The
> > community doesn't have to maintain two branches for bug fix.
> > 2. Users don't have to choose between 0.9.0 and 0.10.0, as they are the
> > same. If they need binary distribution, they just go with 0.10.0.
> > Otherwise, either one is fine.
> >
> > Yufei
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 1:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Dmitri
> > >
> > > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/polaris
> > >
> > > It's empty for now :)
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 8:56 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > As we have a Polaris repo on Docker HUB [...]
> > > >
> > > > What do we currently push there?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Dmitri.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 3:47 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The binary distributions are everything we distribute/publish. I
> would
> > > > > focus on archive (tar.gz/zip), and jar files.
> > > > > As we have a Polaris repo on Docker HUB, I will also include docker
> > > image
> > > > > check.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > JB
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 1:53 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> di...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think it's a good idea. Thanks for taking care of this, JB!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What is included in the binary distribution? Just jars or docker
> too?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Side note: we should probably adjust PR #1070 [1] since the first
> > > release
> > > > > > number is going to be different.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1170
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Dmitri.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Dmitri.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 5:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > > j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We are working on the 1.0.0 release, with a lot of new
> features and
> > > > > fixes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > One important change between 0.9.0 and 1.0.0 is the
> publication of
> > > the
> > > > > > > binary distributions, with all related requirements
> > > (LICENSE/NOTICE,
> > > > > > > etc).
> > > > > > > I'm working on the LICENSE/NOTICE and binary distributions
> > > publication.
> > > > > > > Considering the time we needed to complete the 0.9.0 release, I
> > > think
> > > > > > > it would be great to "anticipate" a little before 1.0.0. It
> would
> > > > > > > allow us to "accelerate" on the 1.0.0 release and beyond.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would like to propose the 0.10.0 release, as an
> "intermediate"
> > > > > > > release. I would like to prepare this release by the end of
> next
> > > week,
> > > > > > > creating the 0.10.x branch (based on the main branch) on
> Saturday,
> > > > > > > March 22 and cutting the 0.10.0 release on Monday, March 24.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > JB
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to