Hi, I've now tested my projects with the release candidate - they were already running against beta1. I found a couple of issues, though I don't think either of them should block the release:
(1) Javen's commit r1721857 broke a hack we had in place to allow us to create our own default font. We should add a proper piece of API to support this: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59127 (2) I notice that the full ooxml-schemas (and ooxml-security) released by me during beta1 have the wrong xmlbeans dependency on Maven. I've raised a bug to track: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59128 As I said, I don't think either of the above is a blocker (the second one isn't usually a problem for reasons detailed on the bug), so +1 from me to release. Thanks, David On 03/03/16 16:30, Dominik Stadler wrote: > Hi, > > I see the following additions to the changelog: > > Excel: Allow to set multiple cell style properties at once > Excel: Add API for inserting ignored warnings into XSSF sheets. This can be > used e.g. to suppress 'number stored as text' warnings. > Excel: New version of ooxml-schema and ooxml-security jars to incorporate > newer code (or whatever the reason was for it, was it Visio-Support?) > Common: Update third-party dependencies: commons-logging, commons-codec, > xmlsec, bouncy-castly, ... > > > One thing I saw is that the version-number in the "sonar" directory in the > source-packages is not updated to "3.14", it still is at "3.14beta1". I > don't think it is a big problem as these files are only used for running > Sonar checks on apache hardware, but maybe we can update the release-guide > and/or scripts to also set the version there when updating to the release > version. > > > Otherwise the packaged source looks fine, local tests with the binaries > also look good > > So +1 from me > > Dominik. > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:26 PM, kiwiwings <kiwiwi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Javen O'Neal wrote >>> This was an insignificant change to POI, so I would omit it from the >>> release notes. >> >> Is there something which I should highlight instead? >> >> I haven't reviewed those many changes and only use the assigned component >> in >> bugzilla >> to find out where a patch was finally applied to (i.e. "ss common" for both >> merged region fixes). >> >> Sorry for my ignorance and lack of involvement, but based on the headings >> in >> the changes page, >> most changes look minor to me ... so please prove me wrong and of course I >> will change the >> announcement accordingly >> >> Andi >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-POI-3-14-final-release-RC1-tp5722149p5722152.html >> Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org >> >> > -- David North - Committer and PMC Member, Apache POI https://home.apache.org/~dnorth/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature