Excellent Dmitriy! Thanks for the info! cheers! esteban.
On Sep 23, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <[email protected]> wrote: > Esteban, it's in already. Remaining sub-tasks are documentation and more > testing. > > D > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Esteban Gutierrez > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) and it would be awesome to see PIG-1314 in 0.11 if >> possible :-) >> >> cheers! >> esteban. >> >> >> -- >> Cloudera, Inc. >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> -- >>> Gianmarco >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Bill Graham <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> sounds good to me >>>>> Julien >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>> Should we branch 0.11? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't see anything major left outstanding other than Jon's >>>> SchemaTuple >>>>>> integration work (which is practically ready and can be pushed to >>> both >>>> a >>>>>> branch and trunk), just a few bug fixes here and there. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to branch before merging in Prasanth's CUBE operator work, >>>> since >>>>>> that's a lot of new code we would want to settle down before >>> releasing, >>>>> and >>>>>> should therefore go into 0.12 (in my opinion). >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>> >>>>>> Dmitriy >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me >>> at >>>> [email protected] going forward.* >>
