+1 (non-binding) and it would be awesome to see PIG-1314 in 0.11 if possible :-)
cheers! esteban. -- Cloudera, Inc. On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 > -- > Gianmarco > > > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Bill Graham <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > sounds good to me > > > Julien > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > Should we branch 0.11? > > > > > > > > I don't see anything major left outstanding other than Jon's > > SchemaTuple > > > > integration work (which is practically ready and can be pushed to > both > > a > > > > branch and trunk), just a few bug fixes here and there. > > > > > > > > I'd like to branch before merging in Prasanth's CUBE operator work, > > since > > > > that's a lot of new code we would want to settle down before > releasing, > > > and > > > > should therefore go into 0.12 (in my opinion). > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > Dmitriy > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me > at > > [email protected] going forward.* > > >
