The PR [3] is merged.  Thanks everyone for helping out!

> ...  let's also rename ScmServerDatanodeHeartbeatProtocol.proto to
StorageContainerDatanodeProtocol.proto, i.e. make it consistent with its
java_outer_classname.

BTW, we have not done the rename due to the 1-1-1 Best Practice [5].  We
probably should follow it.

Tsz-Wo
[3] https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/8208
[5] https://protobuf.dev/best-practices/1-1-1/

On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 10:43 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <weic...@apache.org> wrote:

> I reviewed and +1 the PR. Looks good to me.
>
> Is there a design doc for the overall Ozone Storage Policy support? Under
> HDDS-11233 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11233> I see no
> design docs attached, and there's none in
> https://ozone.apache.org/docs/edge/design.html
>
> There are several similar proposal HDDS-7711
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7711> HDDS-3755
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3755>
> they have design doc attached to them. Should I assume the HDDS-11233 will
> be following one of the designs?
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 3:55 PM Tsz-Wo Nicholas Sze <szets...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > > ... Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12750
> >
> > Submitted a pull request [3] and compared the before and the after.  The
> > change is
> > - wire/binary compatible and
> > - protobuf text format [4] compatible but
> > - Java API incompatible.
> >
> > The wire/binary format and the protobuf text format indeed remain
> > unchanged.
> >
> > The Java API incompatibility seems okay since
> > (i) users should use StorageType instead of the proto Java class, and
> > (ii) this is a major version -- we do allow incompatible change.
> > Anyone directly using the proto Java class does have to update the
> import.
> > It is a simple fix.
> >
> > Please review the PR [3].  Thank you in advance.
> >
> > Tsz-Wo
> > [3] https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/8208
> > [4] https://protobuf.dev/reference/protobuf/textformat-spec/
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 4:13 PM Tsz-Wo Nicholas Sze <szets...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi dev,
> > >
> > > Since this is a now-or-next-year situation, let me split the change
> that
> > > requires updating protolock file from HDDS-11351.  Filed
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12750
> > >
> > > Tsz-Wo
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 2:04 PM Tsz-Wo Nicholas Sze <
> szets...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Wei-Chiu,
> > >>
> > >> (1) A reason for not yet being able to merge the PR is the protolock
> > >> file.  We are not sure how and when to update it for such a change.
> The
> > >> "Build and commit the proto.lock change" section in our release
> > guideline
> > >> [2] does not mention it.
> > >>
> > >> (2) For future incompatible changes, we must wait for the next major
> > >> version.  Anyway, this PR definitely is a good improvement.
> > >>
> > >> (3) If we are not doing it now, I guess it may be hard to get it in a
> > >> maintenance release such as 2.0.1.  This kind of change is usually
> > >> unwelcome in a maintenance release.
> > >>
> > >> XiChen, not sure if you could work on HDDS-11351 in a timely manner.
> >  If
> > >> not, I could continue the work.  Since we already know what to do, we
> > >> should be able to merge the change within a week.
> > >>
> > >> Tsz-Wo
> > >> [2]
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=173085374#OzoneReleaseGuideline-Buildandcommittheproto.lockchange
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 1:12 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <weic...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Thanks for bringing it up!
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm not against including it but
> > >>>
> > >>> (1) the PR has stalled for a few months now. Do we think it can be
> done
> > >>> soon?
> > >>> (2) there's no guarantee the PR will be the final version. What if
> > later
> > >>> on
> > >>> we realize we need to change protobuf again?
> > >>> (3) if it's a compatible change, it doesn't need to be in 2.0.0.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 12:23 PM Tsz-Wo Nicholas Sze <
> > szets...@gmail.com
> > >>> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > More info on HDDS-11351:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > TLDR: The change is wire compatible but requires updating
> protolock.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > XiChen pointed out that both hdds.proto and
> > >>> > ScmServerDatanodeHeartbeatProtocol.proto have the same proto
> package
> > >>> > "hadoop.hdds".  So, we could safely move StorageTypeProto from
> > >>> > ScmServerDatanodeHeartbeatProtocol.proto to hdds.proto. The only
> > >>> difference
> > >>> > is the java_outer_classname. Fortunately,
> > >>> > ScmServerDatanodeHeartbeatProtocol.proto is a non-user facing
> > internal
> > >>> > protocol and the change is wire compatible.  (It is API
> incompatible
> > >>> but it
> > >>> > is fine since the protocol is not a public API.)  So there are no
> > >>> > compatibility issues.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > A problem is that we need to update the protolock file.  If we are
> > >>> going to
> > >>> > do it, let's also rename ScmServerDatanodeHeartbeatProtocol.proto
> to
> > >>> > StorageContainerDatanodeProtocol.proto, i.e. make it consistent
> with
> > >>> its
> > >>> > java_outer_classname.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Tsz-Wo
> > >>> > [1]
> https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/7109#discussion_r2008750162
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 10:04 AM Tsz-Wo Nicholas Sze <
> > >>> szets...@gmail.com>
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > Hi Ozone dev,
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > HDDS-11351 is unifying the protobuf definition of StorageType.
> How
> > >>> about
> > >>> > > we get it in 2.0.0?
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Sorry that I came with this idea late.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Tsz-Wo
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:05 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > weic...@apache.org
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >> By the way, build environment:
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> x86, Amazon Linux, OpenJDK8, Maven 3.9.9, gcc 11
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> build parameters:
> > >>> > >> mvn clean install -Dmaven.javadoc.skip=true -DskipTests
> > >>> -Psign,dist,src
> > >>> > >> -Dtar -Dgpg.keyname="$CODESIGNINGKEY" -Drocks_tools_native
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> # cat /etc/amazon-linux-release
> > >>> > >> Amazon Linux release 2023.6.20250317 (Amazon Linux)
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> # java -version
> > >>> > >> openjdk version "1.8.0_442"
> > >>> > >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment Corretto-8.442.06.1 (build
> > >>> 1.8.0_442-b06)
> > >>> > >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Corretto-8.442.06.1 (build 25.442-b06,
> > >>> mixed
> > >>> > >> mode)
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> # mvn -v
> > >>> > >> Apache Maven 3.9.9 (8e8579a9e76f7d015ee5ec7bfcdc97d260186937)
> > >>> > >> Maven home: /root/apache-maven-3.9.9
> > >>> > >> Java version: 1.8.0_442, vendor: Amazon.com Inc., runtime:
> > >>> > >> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-amazon-corretto.x86_64/jre
> > >>> > >> Default locale: en, platform encoding: UTF-8
> > >>> > >> OS name: "linux", version: "6.1.130-139.222.amzn2023.x86_64",
> > arch:
> > >>> > >> "amd64", family: "unix"
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> # g++ -v
> > >>> > >> Using built-in specs.
> > >>> > >> COLLECT_GCC=g++
> > >>> > >>
> > >>>
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-amazon-linux/11/lto-wrapper
> > >>> > >> OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none
> > >>> > >> OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
> > >>> > >> Target: x86_64-amazon-linux
> > >>> > >> Configured with: ../configure --enable-bootstrap
> --enable-host-pie
> > >>> > >> --enable-host-bind-now --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto
> > >>> > --prefix=/usr
> > >>> > >> --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-bugurl=
> > >>> > >> https://github.com/amazonlinux/amazon-linux-2022
> --enable-shared
> > >>> > >> --enable-threads=posix --enable-checking=release
> > --with-system-zlib
> > >>> > >> --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-exceptions
> > >>> > >> --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-linker-build-id
> > >>> > >> --with-gcc-major-version-only --enable-plugin
> > >>> --enable-initfini-array
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> >
> --with-isl=/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-11.5.0-20240719/obj-x86_64-amazon-linux/isl-install
> > >>> > >> --enable-multilib --with-linker-hash-style=gnu
> > >>> > >> --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --without-cuda-driver
> > >>> > >> --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-cet --with-tune=generic
> > >>> > >> --with-arch_64=x86-64-v2 --with-arch_32=x86-64
> > >>> > --build=x86_64-amazon-linux
> > >>> > >> --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --enable-link-serialization=1
> > >>> > >> Thread model: posix
> > >>> > >> Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
> > >>> > >> gcc version 11.5.0 20240719 (Red Hat 11.5.0-5) (GCC)
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:58 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > >>> weic...@apache.org>
> > >>> > >> wrote:
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> > Here's RC1 vote:
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > Git tag:
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/ozone/releases/tag/ozone-2.0.0-RC1
> > >>> > >> > A total of 1699 resolved jiras:
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HDDS%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.0.0
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > Source code and binary tarball:
> > >>> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ozone/2.0.0-rc1/
> > >>> > >> > Maven artifacts:
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheozone-1030/
> > >>> > >> > PGP key: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ozone/KEYS
> > >>> > >> > Fingerprint: 3ED23305D7631918
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > RC0 and RC1 diff:
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/ozone/compare/ozone-2.0.0-RC0...ozone-2.0.0-RC1
> > >>> > >> > 7 commits:
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > HDDS-12327. HDDS-12668. Fix HSync upgrade test failure in
> non-HA
> > >>> > upgrade
> > >>> > >> > test (#8171)
> > >>> > >> > HDDS-12684. Update NOTICE and LICENSE file (#8160)
> > >>> > >> > HDDS-12327. Restore non-HA (to HA) upgrade test (#7880)
> > >>> > >> > HDDS-12662. Rename upgrade callback directory 1.5.0 to 2.0.0
> > >>> (#8131)
> > >>> > >> > HDDS-12668. HSync upgrade test failure (#8137)
> > >>> > >> > HDDS-12671. Include .editorconfig and .run in source tarball
> > >>> (#8139)
> > >>> > >> > HDDS-12666. Remove -SNAPSHOT from OZONE_CURRENT_VERSION in
> > upgrade
> > >>> > test
> > >>> > >> > (#8136)
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > Please also take a look at the release page draft:
> > >>> > >> > https://jojochuang.github.io/release/2.0.0/
> > >>> > >> > Full CHANGELOGS
> > >>> > >> > https://jojochuang.github.io/release/2.0.0/changelog.2.0.0/
> > >>> > >> > Full ReleaseNotes:
> > >>> > >> >
> https://jojochuang.github.io/release/2.0.0/releasenotes.2.0.0/
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > changelogs and releasenotes are generated by Apache Yetus
> > >>> > >> releasedocmaker:
> > >>> > >> > ./releasedocmaker --project HDDS --version 2.0.0
> --projecttitle
> > >>> > "Apache
> > >>> > >> > Ozone" --fileversions --dirversions --usetoday
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 3:42 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > >>> weic...@apache.org>
> > >>> > >> > wrote:
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> >> Hi Ozone community,
> > >>> > >> >>
> > >>> > >> >> Please try out and cast your vote for the Ozone 2.0.0 release
> > >>> > >> candidate 0.
> > >>> > >> >>
> > >>> > >> >> This is a huge release, containing 1691 resolved jiras,
> > numerous
> > >>> > >> features
> > >>> > >> >> and stability improvements.
> > >>> > >> >>
> > >>> > >> >> Release process:
> > >>> > >> >>
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> >
> https://ozone-site-v2.staged.apache.org/docs/developer-guide/project/release-guide/
> > >>> > >> >> Git tag:
> > >>> > https://github.com/apache/ozone/releases/tag/ozone-2.0.0-RC0
> > >>> > >> >> All resolved jiras:
> > >>> > >> >>
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HDDS%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.0.0
> > >>> > >> >> Source code and binary tarball:
> > >>> > >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/ozone/2.0.0-rc0/
> > >>> > >> >> The Maven artifacts are staged at:
> > >>> > >> >>
> > >>> > >>
> > >>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheozone-1029/
> > >>> > >> >> PGP key: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ozone/KEYS
> > >>> > >> >> Fingerprint: 3ED23305D7631918
> > >>> > >> >>
> > >>> > >> >> Per Apache policy, this release candidate vote will open for
> 7
> > >>> days
> > >>> > >> until
> > >>> > >> >> the end of March 28th 2025. PMC members can cast binding
> votes
> > >>> while
> > >>> > >> >> committers and community contributors are welcomed to cast
> > >>> > non-binding
> > >>> > >> >> votes.
> > >>> > >> >>
> > >>> > >> >> Best regards,
> > >>> > >> >> Weichiu
> > >>> > >> >>
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to