Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote on 07/19/2016 12:57:23 AM: > From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> > To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org > Date: 07/19/2016 12:57 AM > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev, v23, 2/2] ovn-controller: Add incremental > processing to lflow_run and physical_run > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 04:21:17PM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote: > > This code changes to allow incremental processing of the > > logical flow and physical binding tables whenver possible. > > > > Note: flows created by physical_run for multicast_groups are > > *NOT* handled incrementally due to to be solved issues > > with GWs and local routers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com> > > With this applied, I get a number of apparently consistent test failures > (literally no passes in 5+ runs) that I don't see, at least not > consistently, if I revert it: > > OVN end-to-end tests > > 2106: ovn -- vtep: 3 HVs, 1 VIFs/HV, 1 GW, 1 LS FAILED (ovn.at:1307) > 2107: ovn -- 3 HVs, 1 VIFs/HV, 1 software GW, 1 LS FAILED (ovn.at:1473) > 2108: ovn -- 3 HVs, 3 LS, 3 lports/LS, 1 LR FAILED (ovn.at:1887) > 2110: ovn -- 2 HVs, 2 LS, 1 lport/LS, 2 peer LRs FAILED (ovn.at:2416) > 2115: ovn -- 2 HVs, 3 LRs connected via LS, static routes FAILED > (ovn.at:3053) > > Do these pass reasonably often for you? (Maybe my changes to the > previous patch screwed something up?) >
Honestly, yes, all tests passed for me for the two patch sets as I submitted them - let me take a look at where things stand and see if I can work out what's going on. Ryan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
