Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> writes: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 11:39:06AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to request for the following 5 commits to be backported to >> 2.5.0, if it's appropriate: >> >> 314ce6479a8380e2aeaa53eb5bab96a23c06d62d - ovs-tcpdump: Add a tcpdump >> wrapper utility >> 8647686ee8ac496b54499d14f3c37de84fdd47df - fedora: Add pcap, tcpdump and >> tcpundump utilities to test >> 3239f7a0b0c0ba799aafb782f01af126c016b420 - debian: Add the tcpdump >> utility to the debian package >> f75fe4879c8bbf539d88036c56c71800cf29a703 - rhel: Fix RHEL package >> build breakage >> 312352673895035bfa286f8cf7c3627d580fdc2b - utilities/ovs-tcpdump.in: Fix >> port lookups >> 52654c4a1272f3f4e8e88f1c710d3e9e545014ef - utilities/ovs-tcpdump.in: >> Poll the process status >> >> These are low-impact (meaning they are all self-contained), to bring >> ovs-tcpdump to release 2.5. However, it is technically a 'feature,' so >> I understand if it is inappropriate to backport. > > I'd rather not backport these changes, since they do add a new feature. > Is there some reason why it's important?
I'm just getting lots of requests to somehow provide it, so I am posting here. I'd prefer not to backport them in rhel-only - best if our package can match with upstream. However, I think it may be okay if we provide the bits ourselves for this feature. I'll work with Flavio on this. > Thanks, Thank you for the consideration. > Ben. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
