On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 11:39:06AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to request for the following 5 commits to be backported to > 2.5.0, if it's appropriate: > > 314ce6479a8380e2aeaa53eb5bab96a23c06d62d - ovs-tcpdump: Add a tcpdump > wrapper utility > 8647686ee8ac496b54499d14f3c37de84fdd47df - fedora: Add pcap, tcpdump and > tcpundump utilities to test > 3239f7a0b0c0ba799aafb782f01af126c016b420 - debian: Add the tcpdump > utility to the debian package > f75fe4879c8bbf539d88036c56c71800cf29a703 - rhel: Fix RHEL package build > breakage > 312352673895035bfa286f8cf7c3627d580fdc2b - utilities/ovs-tcpdump.in: Fix > port lookups > 52654c4a1272f3f4e8e88f1c710d3e9e545014ef - utilities/ovs-tcpdump.in: > Poll the process status > > These are low-impact (meaning they are all self-contained), to bring > ovs-tcpdump to release 2.5. However, it is technically a 'feature,' so > I understand if it is inappropriate to backport.
I'd rather not backport these changes, since they do add a new feature. Is there some reason why it's important? Thanks, Ben. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
