Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote on 07/03/2016 10:29:08 AM:

> From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Date: 07/03/2016 10:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] Add address set support.
>
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 09:59:38AM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote:
> > Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote on 07/03/2016 09:45:27 AM:
> >
> > > From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> > > To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> > > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> > > Date: 07/03/2016 09:45 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] Add address set support.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 10:51:39PM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 07/02/2016 10:41:18
PM:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > > To: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> > > > > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> > > > > Date: 07/02/2016 10:41 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] Add address set support.
> > > > > Sent by: "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM wrote on 07/02/2016 10:37:24 PM:
> > > > >
> > > > > > From: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM
> > > > > > To: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> > > > > > Cc: bscha...@redhat.com, dev@openvswitch.org
> > > > > > Date: 07/02/2016 10:37 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] Add address set support.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 07/02/2016
10:30:29
> > PM:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> > > > > > > To: bscha...@redhat.com
> > > > > > > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> > > > > > > Date: 07/02/2016 10:30 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] Add address set
support.
> > > > > > > Sent by: "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:20:40PM +0530, bscha...@redhat.com
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > From: Russel Bryant <russ...@ovn.org>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This misspells Russell's name (I fixed it).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Update the OVN expression parser to support address sets.
> > > > > Previously,
> > > > > > > > you could have a set of IP or MAC addresses in this form:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >     {addr1, addr2, ..., addrN}
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This patch adds support for a bit of indirection where we
can
> > > > define
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > set of addresses and refer to them by name.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >     $name
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This '$name' can be used in the expresssions like
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >     {addr1, addr2, $name, ... }
> > > > > > > >     {$name}
> > > > > > > >     $name
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > A future patch will expose the ability to define address
sets
> > for
> > > > > use.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Russell Bryant <russ...@ovn.org>
> > > > > > > > Co-authored-by: Babu Shanmugam <bscha...@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Babu Shanmugam <bscha...@redhat.com>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks a lot!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The results that Kyle reported are really impressive, so I
want
> > to
> > > > > start
> > > > > > > getting this in.  Unfortunately I think that patch 2 probably
> > > > conflicts
> > > > > > > with Ryan's incremental series, which I'm trying to
prioritize
> > > > because
> > > > > > > it's been in progress so long.  So I'm just looking at patch
1 in
> > > > this
> > > > > > > review round.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Because of our interest in this set, I've already taken a pass
> > > > > > at merging part 2 with the incremental patch series and can
> > > > > > share the needed delta (if it would be of interested here...)
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh well, I conveniently forgot to mention in the above that
you've
> > > > already
> > > > > nailed part 3 of my latest series, so I'll be spinning a v21...
> > > > >
> > > > > Ryan
> > > >
> > > > Ben, the rebase delta for part 3 is a single line (L338 getting
NULL
> > added
> > > > as the third arguement) - I can spin you another patch series for a
> > single
> > > > line change, but it likely won't land until tomorrow morning...
> > >
> > > Trivial rebases are a waste of time.  Given that it's so simple, I'll
> > > work from v20.
> > >
> >
> > Your call - I have v21 done (starting with patch 2 of Address Sets as
> > patch 1 of the new series) but I'm happy to have you work from v20
> > since I'm not sure I correctly addressed (sorry for the pun) all of
> > your review comments on that newly included patch...
>
> Go ahead and post it then, no point in duplicating work ;-)
>

Done and done, v21 is at patchworks - I'll mark v20 as "not applicable"

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to