"dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 07/02/2016 10:41:18 PM:
> From: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> To: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Date: 07/02/2016 10:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] Add address set support.
> Sent by: "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org>
>
> Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM wrote on 07/02/2016 10:37:24 PM:
>
> > From: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM
> > To: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> > Cc: bscha...@redhat.com, dev@openvswitch.org
> > Date: 07/02/2016 10:37 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] Add address set support.
> >
> > "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> wrote on 07/02/2016 10:30:29 PM:
> >
> > > From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> > > To: bscha...@redhat.com
> > > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> > > Date: 07/02/2016 10:30 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] Add address set support.
> > > Sent by: "dev" <dev-boun...@openvswitch.org>
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:20:40PM +0530, bscha...@redhat.com wrote:
> > > > From: Russel Bryant <russ...@ovn.org>
> > >
> > > This misspells Russell's name (I fixed it).
> > >
> > > > Update the OVN expression parser to support address sets.
> Previously,
> > > > you could have a set of IP or MAC addresses in this form:
> > > >
> > > > {addr1, addr2, ..., addrN}
> > > >
> > > > This patch adds support for a bit of indirection where we can
define
> a
> > > > set of addresses and refer to them by name.
> > > >
> > > > $name
> > > >
> > > > This '$name' can be used in the expresssions like
> > > >
> > > > {addr1, addr2, $name, ... }
> > > > {$name}
> > > > $name
> > > >
> > > > A future patch will expose the ability to define address sets for
> use.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Russell Bryant <russ...@ovn.org>
> > > > Co-authored-by: Babu Shanmugam <bscha...@redhat.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Babu Shanmugam <bscha...@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot!
> > >
> > > The results that Kyle reported are really impressive, so I want to
> start
> > > getting this in. Unfortunately I think that patch 2 probably
conflicts
> > > with Ryan's incremental series, which I'm trying to prioritize
because
> > > it's been in progress so long. So I'm just looking at patch 1 in
this
> > > review round.
> >
> > Because of our interest in this set, I've already taken a pass
> > at merging part 2 with the incremental patch series and can
> > share the needed delta (if it would be of interested here...)
>
> Oh well, I conveniently forgot to mention in the above that you've
already
> nailed part 3 of my latest series, so I'll be spinning a v21...
>
> Ryan
Ben, the rebase delta for part 3 is a single line (L338 getting NULL added
as the third arguement) - I can spin you another patch series for a single
line change, but it likely won't land until tomorrow morning...
Ryan
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
