On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Justin Pettit <jpet...@ovn.org> wrote:
> > > On May 21, 2016, at 6:35 AM, Russell Bryant <russ...@ovn.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Han Zhou <zhou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Russell, shall this be merged? > > > > Eventually. :-) I'm just way behind from being out. I do plan to > finish this. > > > > I owe another revision of this series for Justin to review. I need to > apply some doc suggestions he had. > > > > Justin had also requested a change so that we were explicitly setting a > single bit of ct_label and not the whole field. There were some issues in > that area in the past, but I think they're all resolved now. I should > probably go ahead and fix that before posting another revision. > > As an FYI, a few of us have been trying to find a way to have ovs-vswitchd > revalidate conntrack entries just like it does for megaflows. It's really > tricky, but we think we have it narrowed down to a couple of options. If > we can do that, it should be a bit cleaner and have fewer corner cases > (e.g., immediately reject reply traffic and related flows). I think we'll > know this week whether it's viable or not. > Would we have a flow to delete conntrack entries in that case? -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
