On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 02:37:50PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 03:06:17PM -0600, Ryan Moats wrote: > > From: RYAN D. MOATS <rmo...@us.ibm.com> > > > > Currently changes are added to the front of the track list, so > > they are looped through in LIFO order. Incremental processing > > is more efficient with a FIFO presentation, so > > (1) add new changes to the back of the track list, and > > (2) move updated changes to the back of the track list > > > > Signed-off-by: RYAN D. MOATS <rmo...@us.ibm.com> > > I applied this because it makes a lot of sense to me: it causes changes > to be presented in their natural order, that is, in the order in which > they were received. I'm copying Shad, the original author of the column > tracking code, on this message in case he wants to advocate that the > previous order was superior.
Oops, trying again with Shad's email address fixed. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
