On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 03:06:17PM -0600, Ryan Moats wrote: > From: RYAN D. MOATS <rmo...@us.ibm.com> > > Currently changes are added to the front of the track list, so > they are looped through in LIFO order. Incremental processing > is more efficient with a FIFO presentation, so > (1) add new changes to the back of the track list, and > (2) move updated changes to the back of the track list > > Signed-off-by: RYAN D. MOATS <rmo...@us.ibm.com>
I applied this because it makes a lot of sense to me: it causes changes to be presented in their natural order, that is, in the order in which they were received. I'm copying Shad, the original author of the column tracking code, on this message in case he wants to advocate that the previous order was superior. Thanks, Ben. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
